Michelle Obama urges high schoolers to monitor their families' politically incorrect thoughts

                                                     Published time: May 27, 2014 16:39                                                                                            Edited time: May 28, 2014 08:39                                                                                                     
Get short URL                            
U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama (Reuters / Yuri Gripas)

U.S. First Lady Michelle Obama (Reuters / Yuri Gripas)

In a speech seniors designed to commemorate the US Supreme Court decision that desegregated schools, First Lady Michelle Obama made a statement against racism to high school students that reminded critics of George Orwell’s “1984.”

Obama spoke to graduating high school students from five area  high schools at the Topeka, Kan. Senior Recognition Day on May  16, the day before their graduation ceremony and on the eve of  the 60th anniversary of the landmark Brown v. Board of Education  Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation in public  schools. The court case began in Topeka in 1951.

  Obama spoke of the decision by Topeka parents to fight against  the notion of “separate but equal” education for their children.

“Now, these were ordinary folks. Most of them were not civil  rights activists, and some of them were probably nervous about  speaking up, worried they might cause trouble for themselves and  their families. And the truth is, while the black schools were  far away, the facilities were pretty decent, and the teachers  were excellent,” she said. “But eventually, these  parents went to court to desegregate their children’s schools  because, as one of the children later explained as an adult, she  said, ‘We were talking about the principle of the thing’.”

But after touching on the historic ruling and the important  anniversary, the president’s wife quickly moved on to reports  that segregation  is back in the United States’ public schools. “See, many  districts in this country have actually pulled back on efforts to  integrate their schools, and many communities have become less  diverse as folks have moved from cities to suburbs,” Obama  admonished. “And even in schools that seem integrated  according to the numbers, when you look a little closer, you see  students from different backgrounds sitting at separate lunch  tables, or tracked into different classes, or separated into  different clubs or activities.”

Obama drew parallels between the fight for integration that was  supposed to have ended in 1954 and what students face today.

So, graduates, the truth is that Brown vs. Board of Ed.  isn’t just about our history, it’s about our future,” she  said. “Because while that case was handed down 60 years ago,  Brown is still being decided every single day –- not just in our  courts and schools, but in how we live our lives.”

It was then that critics say the first lady veered off into   “thoughtcrime,” a term from Orwell’s dystopian novel   “1984,” defined as “an instance of unorthodox or  controversial thinking, considered as a criminal offense or as  socially unacceptable,” according to the Oxford  Dictionaries.

“There’s no court case against believing in stereotypes or  thinking that certain kinds of hateful jokes or comments are  funny. So the answers to many of our challenges today can’t  necessarily be found in our laws,” Obama said. “As you  go forth, when you encounter folks who still hold the old  prejudices because they’ve only been around folks like  themselves, when you meet folks who think they know all the  answers because they’ve never heard any other viewpoints, it’s up  to you to help them see things differently.”

“Maybe that starts simply in your own family, when grandpa  tells that off-colored joke at Thanksgiving, or you’ve got an  aunt talks about ‘those people’. Well, you can politely inform  them that they’re talking about your friends,” Obama  continued. “Because this issue is so sensitive, is so  complicated, so bound up with a painful history. And we need your  generation to help us break through. We need all of you to ask  the hard questions and have the honest conversations, because  that is the only way we will heal the wounds of the past and move  forward to a better future.”

Cheryl Chumley, a reporter for The Washington Times and the  author of “Police State USA,” believes the first lady’s remarks  as an overreach, and a way to attack people for politically  incorrect thinking. “Michelle Obama’s push for kids around  the nation to monitor their family members for perceived racist  comments is just another way the government seeks to inject  itself into an area it doesn’t really belong — the American  home,” she told   The Daily Caller.

  The author cited other examples of politicians and government  agencies aligned with the Obama administration singling people  out for thinking differently, including Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.)  attacking the Koch brothers for donating to conservative causes,  the administration’s charge against the gun lobby, and the IRS  targeting of Tea Party organizations for audits. “Does it get  any more police state than that?” Chumley asks.

  Pete Kasperowicz at   The Blaze agreed. First lady Michelle Obama is  encouraging students to monitor their older relatives, friends  and co-workers for any racially insensitive comments they might  make, and to challenge those comments whenever they’re  made,” he wrote.

  So did Jim Treacher at   The Daily Caller. “There can be no aspect of your daily  life that’s removed from politics. Now you will be monitored by  your own children for expressing unapproved opinions,” he wrote.   “You’d better watch what you say at the dinner table, Mom and  Dad,” he wrote.

  Conservative radio host Glenn Beck saw the speech as divisive.   “Michelle Obama gave a speech where… they’re worried about  segregation again, and I don’t think that that was something that  any of us worried about six years ago,” Beck said   on his show. “Was anybody on the, ‘Hey, we might all be  segregated again?’ I don’t know. It’s strange how their policies  to bring us all together is just driving a stake in our heart and  a wedge between all of us.”

But not everyone saw the first lady’s remarks as insidious.   “Mrs. Obama talked about Brown V. Board in a way nobody else  could or would. It's great not to be encumbered with the thoughts  of reelection and campaign,” a   Daily Kos member wrote. “There is no greater truth with  her conclusion in today's America, and what we must continue to  fight.”

Lauren Sherwood, the student who introduced Obama at the event,  told the   Kansas City Star that the speech was “beautiful” and   “everything you could have hoped for in a graduation speech,  plus more.”

Other students agreed. “It did really speak to us,”   Topeka West High School student Onree Spencer said to the Star.   “Even though past generations are hanging on to what they  were taught, we need to be able to teach them about our  generation.”

Obama was originally to give a combined commencement address for  the five area schools on May 17, but parents protested the  decision, complaining that the presence of the first lady, her  security detail and cadre of staff would limit space for  graduates’ families and overshadow a day that is supposed to  honor the seniors’, not politics. The White House and the school  district came to a compromise to have Obama speak the night  before to the five schools, then each school would have its own  graduation on Saturday. Michelle Obama urges high schoolers to monitor their families' politically incorrect thoughts — RT USA http://rt.com/usa/161752-flotus-students-monitor-parents/#.U__IFqH6i2s

Views: 7

Reply to This

© 2024   Created by Raliegh Jones Jr..   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service