Wolette Selassie's Blog (2)

There is a growing need for our students to conduct more research on the missing Black presence in the bible; everyone has had an opportunity to interpret the Bible but us and if you know the history, if they included the Black presence, the entire book would be more than 80% our history. Our research is based on 40 years research; a member of our group (Ph.d) has written a curriculum is currently under consideration at a university in the midwest...by the Grace of the Holy Spirit we can…

There are, no doubt, many of the Cloth who wonder why the African presence is missing in the bible, despite the fact that Kush “spelled “Cush” via Greek translation, is the second country mentioned in the bible (Genesis 2:13), and may very well be the first because both the Pison and the Gihon Rivers are indigenous to Ethipia, based on the ancient and modern geography.  Such historical errors and omissions render the first translation of the bible by the Greeks in 322 somewhat historically…