As their house was under the Blood in chapter 12:5 of Exodus the mercy seat in Lev.16:12-14,Now they are being brought under the blood covenant with the Lord,This resembles our own relationship to God made possible by the Blood of the Lamb of God(1Pet.1:2 1Cor.5:7 Jn.1:29 1Pet.1:9 all allude to the Pasover Lamb.
More specifically, the New Testament identifies the passover Lamb,the young Lamb,sacrificed in place of the family's first born,
As a Type of the person and work of Jesus. Let's look at this(a type is a divinely ordained correspendence between a person,event, or institution and it's antitype or fulfillment).Most Biblical TYPES are fulfilled in the person and work of Jesus.
At the beginning of Jesus ministry John the baptist prophetically announced that Jesus was the Lamb of God. Paul states that Christ are passover was sacrificed for us.
1The passover Lamb had to be without blemish.
2Male
3Young
4 It had to be examined 4 days from the selection tothe sacrifice
5Had to be slain in public
6None of it's bones were to be broken
7It's Blood on the Israelites door posts was a sign tha God should not destroy that familie's first born.
I humbily submit this to you my brother's and sister's that Jesus met all these qualifications Sinless and perfect in His humanity He was both.2Male 3 some what young when He was slain 4He lived a meticulously examined life5He died publicly and despite the brutal death 6 none of His bones were broken(Jn.19:36).7Jesus Blood is the sign of Jesus's death through Jesus death,we are saved from the coming Judgement(Rom.5:9,Eph.2:13,Col.1:14,Heb.9:22;10:19, 1Pet.1:2 1Jn.1:7,Rev.1:5,7:14).Even as Abel who was killed by his brother(Gen.4:10).Whose Blood cried out to God even as the one more innocent than Abel was to have His blood shed as well Type of Jesus(Heb.12:24).In his manner of death Abel depict's the Savior Jesus.
The only difference one cried for revenge the other speaks of redemption.If Adam is the type of Him who was to come Rom.5:15
We died in the first Adam,Jesus is the last Adam where we have life.Amen!!!

Views: 49

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

God bless u in another site i had to place this because one person did not understand when i gave the O.T. answer of the mercy seat they responded they did not agree that that was not Jesus Blood
Typology describes the situation when something done in the OT is brought to notice and is shown to have signified something done or about to be done in the NT.

The typological relation between the two Testaments was summed up in Augustine
In the OT the NT lies hidden; in the NT the OT stands revealed.

(Paraphrase "The Old is the New concealed, while the New is the Old revealed.")

Stated another way typology is the study of Biblical comparisons made between persons, events, things and institutions of one biblical period and those of another, most often between the OT and the NT (there are also comparisons between persons, events, etc in the Old Testament but these are less common).

Typology in Scripture serves to demonstrate the unbroken continuity in God’s plan of redemptive history between the Old and New Testaments, and this alone should encourage us in our faith in God's Word of Truth and His trustworthy character (see note 1Thessalonians 5:24).

The New Bible Dictionary has an interesting definition of typology describing it as...

A way of setting forth the biblical history of salvation so that some of its earlier phases are seen as anticipations of later phases, or some later phase as the recapitulation or fulfilment of an earlier one... In the NT the Christian salvation is presented as the climax of the mighty works of God, as the ‘antitype’ of His ‘typical’ mighty works in the OT. (Wood, D. R. W. New Bible Dictionary. InterVarsity Press)

The Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible writes that typology as the...

Branch of biblical interpretation in which an element found in the OT prefigures one found in the NT. The initial one is called the type and the fulfillment is designated the antitype (see Gk antitupon). Either type or antitype may be a person, thing, or event, but often the type is Messianic and frequently refers to salvation. In working with types, the safest procedure is to limit them to those expressly mentioned in the Bible (cf. 1 Cor 4:6). On the other hand, it is argued that such an approach limits the legitimate use of types, for some obvious types are not mentioned in the NT.

Further, the types given in the NT are examples which demonstrate how to find others in the OT.

Some examples may serve to identify some biblical types and antitypes: Jesus said to Nicodemus,
As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, so must the Son of Man be lifted up” (Jn 3:14; cf. Nu 21:9)

The Passover lamb (Ex 12:1-13, 49) is a type of Christ (1 Cor 5:7)

The rock from which Israel drank in the wilderness (Ex 17:6) prefigures Christ (1 Cor 10:3, 4).
The Book of Hebrews is replete with examples of types which represent the Messiah. All of the sacrifices ordained by the ritual law which God gave at Sinai typified some aspect of the person and work of Jesus. The blood that was sprinkled on the altar spoke of the blood of the One Who was slain once for all (Heb 9:12-22).

In biblical study a type differs from allegory, which generally spiritualizes Bible history (Ed note: for more discussion of allegory and related topics see [i.] Art and Science of Interpretation; [ii.] The Rise of Allegorical Interpretation; [iii.] Understanding Symbols and Figures and [iv.] Understanding Numbers) . In the early church this technique was carried to exaggerated lengths by Origen and followed by others....

There are details which are singled out as types. For example, in the directions for the celebration of the Passover, it is said of the roasted lamb, “you shall not break a bone of it” (Ex 12:46). This is repeated by the psalmist in Psalm 34:20 as a predictive prophecy. In the account of the crucifixion of Jesus (John 19:31-36), the Jews requested that the legs of the victims be broken to hasten their death so the bodies could be removed from the crosses before the Sabbath. When the soldiers came to Jesus, they found that he was already dead and did not break his legs. (more discussion of typology including differentiation from illustration, parable, (Elwell, W. A., & Beitzel, B. J. Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible. Page 2109. Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Book House. 1988) (Bolding added)

The type is the initial person, event, thing or institution while the corresponding and later person, event, thing or institution is called the antitype (copy, counterpart, see Gk antitupon). The Apostle Paul portrays Christ as the antitype of Adam (the type) in Romans 5:12–21 writing...

Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him Who was to come. (see note Romans 5:14) (Comment: To summarize Romans 5:12-21, just as Adam the type represented all mankind in the fall, so that when he sinned, all mankind sinned, so too Christ the antitype, in His death, burial and resurrection represented all mankind who are to be redeemed by grace through faith in His finished work. All mankind is either in Adam or in Christ [cf 1 Cor 15:22]. In Christ believers have access to a high position and glorious privileges that we could never have had in Adam [e.g., seated in Christ at the right hand of the Father! see note Ephesians 2:6])
Amen! Amen!Amen! i thank God for you Dr. Maxcina Gadsden. i want go in to detail but i had somone else say that i had No scriptural backing to my posted blogs.But i knew God would show up, you are the second one that has shown up in this season,
Remember everyone is on different levels. They also must have a teachable spirit. Not everything will be receive or use.
Praise God for all gifts given.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Raliegh Jones Jr..   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service