APOSTLE RONALD D HOWELL SIR, of LIFE CHANGERS INTERNATIONAL NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES IN KAISERSLAUTERN, GERMANY IS ON THE RUN!!!!

Apostle Howell MADE CHASE GOODEN delete his page because Howell is in trouble.  Howell the man who said that he never ran from anything is now on the run.  COWARD!

 

 

Views: 32083

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Jeff,
That was a good connection. I am of the opinion that Noble could very well be our buddy Victor, but keep in mind that, a person that has to get permission to take a vacation from their pastor is not allowed to think on their own so they are being fed what to say.
Again, if one has truly repented, why would they not want to make things right with those they have wronged? Jesus said Himself, if you remember your brother has an ought against you, leave your gift at the alter and go be reconciled. How can you “truly” repent to God, when you have no regard on how you treat the very people who are created in His image? I am of the firm belief, that the regard we have for God is the same regard we have for people. Jesus said, whatever you have done unto the least of these my brethren, you have done unto me. John tells us - we can’t say we love God who we can’t see, if we don’t love our brother whom we can tangibly see. If we truly love or brother or sister in Christ, we have no issues apologizing for it would be the least we could do. Howell can’t continue to make excuses on why he slaughters God’s sheep in the name of – I only have to repent to God. That’s the mindset of a person who feel justified in what they are doing – it’s just that plain. That’s an excuse to continue down the same destructive path that has finally caught up with him. That is the reason this forum is in place – to warn others from being placed on the table to be slaughtered.
LCI Members, your leader has orchestrated a website with, more than likely, the assistance of Jones and Williams. This site was to retaliate against members they believe are reaching out to warn you about their past experiences and what you are involved with. Understand that a Cult leader will always defame someone else to make themselves look good. Google the traits of a Cult and a Cult leader and see what you find. These are the people that you confide in who are supposed to protect your privacy and they will use it against you to gain control. We are not here to bash but to warn you. I pray you take heed.

First about the leave.  The church does now and has always operated by the dedication of the saints.  There is a work that needs to be done, you all knew this before you started.  The work needs to be done behind the scenes as well as the message that needs to be preached.  The fact that you are required to take leave is for the consideration of others.  It has nothing to do with Apostle wanting to control you.  If you say that you are willing to work in children's church to watch the babies and people are counting on you to work in children's church to watch the babies then that is what should be expected of you.  The leave comes in to deconflict with other people who want to go do something.  It's so you can let people know in writing that I will not be there to do my job so somebody else will have to fill in from this date to this date.  It's all about accountability so the work can still be done.   The fact that this is one of your complaints shows that you were never really trying to do God's work.  You just wanted to show up and do what you wanted to do whenever you wanted to do it.

You talk about Apostle hold you in bondage but he always said that you can leave when you want to.  Apostle never forced any one of you to be a leader.  He never forced you to make a vow.  You vowed on your own.  You committed on your own.  Just like you decided to break your vow on your own.  Some of the things you speak of you volunteered to do and was alright with the rules in place before you ever accepted your leadership roles.  Being a Christian is a commitment.  We're really not supposed to be vacationing anyways.  The bible says we are to be a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to the lord.  We are also supposed to be dead to the world.

You have yet to forsake your old lives you want to go out and be of the world and still serve God. But get mad when that is unacceptable or Apostle holds you to higher standards as Christians.

Regardless of what you say about Apostle he warned you about his standards before you ever decided to put your hand to the plow.  He also does more than what he demands of us.  He preaches 4-5 times a week, which means he has to be there those 4-5 times a week, it also means he has to study a lot more than you do.  Most of you were barely able to preach 4-5 times during your time as a life changer.  At least he has people willing to come on here and stick up for him, you stick up for people that you probably never talk to outside of this.  Why is that?  Apostle has people willing to Follow him which speaks more highly of his character than yours.  If you are so saved or are doing so much for God why is nobody willing to follow you?  Why were there not more people willing to follow you when you left life changers?  You say that you were spoken badly about when you left but if you were as spiritual as you think you are and him as evil as you say he is people would've been more willing to follow you than him because your fruits would have spoken louder than any words could ever have.  For example the twins, they were nice to some people but they both had a nasty attitude a lot of the time.  This still holds true go back and look at wanzo brown's posts you can tell when they write because of the anger and the broken english.

I'm just saying you guys are as saved you say you are and Apostle isn't as bad as you say he is.  You back people into corners and get mad when they respond.  That's your fault.  You can say whatever you want about me but or Apostle but just know it's not going to go unanswered forever.  You speak of the site used to retaliate and say that is the trait of a cult leader but you guys did the same thing.  Go back through these posts and look at the statements you've made and the names you've called.  You are even more of a cult than you say life changers is.

You fast for the down fall of others.  You talk crap about people's children.  You talk crap about people's dead relatives.  You speak of Apostle going to jail and getting raped and then think this all is fine because you are seeking justice.  You're worse than what it is you're attacking, period.  The funny thing is you look to the world for a definition of a cult also, how stupid are you?  The world thinks Christianity done right is a cult.  You opened this door, you started this.

I pray you take heed, stop this, I keep requesting but you keep writing.  It'll be best for everybody if you guys just stop. I know you won't but I still gotta ask.

Noble,
You are correct, one must be accountable. I don’t think anyone should just take leave without ensuring that their areas are covered and let the Pastor know ahead of time – as a courtesy “only”. They should return from their time of rest to a Pastor who has not fired them nor ordered all his leaders to shun this particular person so they fear taking another vacation. Noble, I know your story brother and this is not the norm for any church – every other church can’t be missing the mark and LCI is the only one that is on point. I think you now this isn’t right. The family is one’s first ministry. We can’t tell the world about how God will provide a better life for them when they see our homes tore-up because quality time is neglected and replaced with Church events that are there as a form of control. The sinner will say if your God allows your family life to be as such, I prefer to say in the world; at least as the man, I can run my own home. The smiles and faking of a happy marriage only goes so far, and then you see the divorces that are prominent in LCI. Majority of these marriages could have been resolved had they been taught that their family was their first ministry. Since your Pastor refuses to marry because he enjoys the sin of concubinism, he can’t truthfully impart the importance of a healthy marriage – he will only impart those things that destroy this institution that God has ordained. The spirit your Pastor operates in(Jezebel) replaces Gods institutions with its own. Noble, when you serve in ministry out of a healthy marriage you minister to others before they even hear the message preached. A healthy marriage comes from time invested in one another – away from Church. Just because Howell refuses to marry and enjoy the pleasure of “one wife”, doesn’t mean he should substitute his loneliness with the LCI membership’s time. With the life he has chosen to live comes with being lonely that’s the choice he has made. God said it’s better for man not to be alone but Howell choses to have concubines to substitute to fill this void. Nonetheless, it’s ungodly and still yields the results of loneliness.


 Let’s talk leadership. A good leader has followers who follow because they believe in him. A dictator has followers because he dominates, manipulate and intimidate. So yes, one will follow if they want to be a leader tomorrow. If one doesn’t want to be ignored by the person that validates them. A real leader has followers who follow willingly when there are no strings attached.


 Let’s talk about him preaching 4-5 times a week. Your pastor is single and only deal with his concubines when he need physical relief; therefore, he has all this time on his hands and expect those who choose to get married and do it God’s way to suffer for his ungodly decisions. It doesn’t matter if he preaches 7 days a week that’s his choice and he should not manipulate his members or “leaders” to be there every time because he is. It is their choice!!!!! This technique is to ensure you are to busy to pray so you can’t clearly hear from God; Howell only wants you to hear him so you can fulfill his selfish demands.


 You speak of being backed and a corner and lashing out. I can understand that to a certain degree. IF he can lash out (respond) when he feels he is being wronged, how does he think over 100 of his ex-members are feeling. They have been backed in corners for years and had no way of lashing out or responding, as you put it – I am just saying. I received some info concerning the twins. They are wonderful people form what I hear and ensured his establishment was clean, but they are so bad now because he took advantage of them – got it. This site isn’t a Cult because those who want to leave are welcomed to without any reprisal. In a Cult when you leave you are shunned by the members as a form of reprisal – like what is practiced in your institution. As far as I am concerned, this will go on until he repents or close down his establishment – he is “now” accountable rather he likes it or not. Noble, I honor your loyalty and candor, but you were brought up in ministry by the wrong man and it is going to take a lot of time to be reprogrammed God’s way upon your eyes opening. I am praying for you despite what you may think.

You pray?  Jones, who do you pray to, Lacie, and add Colm (the fake one), You have made our case very easy to prove to authorities.  Now, authorities are well able to understand that Life Changers International is a cult.  It is required that we prove it, and your post provide of ample evidence.  Thank you.

 

By your constant comments, you have hurt your leader.  I can do a much better job defending Howell than any of you have done.  You have exposed Ronald Howell, and if I were him (thank God, I'm not), I would fire both you and the pastor.

 

Let's correct you on a few items. 

 

To begin with, you error in basic simple biblical knowledge, again, Howell must have picked you to be a strongman (muscle-head), because you give the title "Bishop" a black eye.  Even Howell has to be laughing behind you back, because you say some of the stupidest things.

 

Regardless of what gift and Christian posesses, the Bible declares the following:

Concerning spiritual gifts:

And there are diversity of activities, but it is the same "GOD" who works all in all......buy one and the same "SPIRIT" WORKS ALL THESE THINGS, distributing to each one individually as HE WILLS  1 Cor 12

 

For the gifts (the favor that GOD bestows on men/women)

And the calling of GOD ( this is GOD'S invitation)

Without Repentance (This is about GOD'S purpose)  Romans 11:29

 

Here's one of the favorites of your false leader Howell:

 

AND HE GAVE SOME AS APOSTLES, AND SOME AS PROPHETS, AND SOME AS EVANGELISTS, AND SOME AS PASTORS AND TEACHERS,   Ephesians 4

 

Jesus said that He is vine, you (we), are the branches.  If a man remains in Me, and I in him, he will bear much fruit, apart from ME (JESUS) YOU CAN DO NOTHING! John 15:5

 

Jones, you come on here acting stupid, trying to run down about how long people can give a message, and the point you fail to tell everyone is that your big behind has never given a literate gospel message!  It was already stated that all you ever have to say is something about Howell whom you refer to as (please excuse me for what I am about to say) the man of God.  Brother Goo-No, even though he may not be an experienced speaker did a better job than you.  But that is not the point.

 

The point is that you and Howell complain about all your standards, which are aimed primarily as "single" women, and destroying marriages and families, yet you foolishly think that you have somewhat to brag, and put down the people who left Life Changers.  Thanks again, because of your constant stupid remarks, you have given us all the ammo we need.  Please continue to come on this site and display your ignorance, we appreciate you.

 

As for the Solemn Assembly, I am glad that you disapprove.  I know that we had your leader's attention.  All three of you reprobates were to be enjoying your shepherd's appreciation, however, you were on here meddling with us.  You were suppose to be minding your own store, but you could not resist coming on here because you are afraid at what is coming to your leader.  We did not have to fast for the downfall of this wick man. 

 

Howell is FALLEN ALREADY!  That is the point you fail to see.  Howell is a defeated false apostle.  All that is left is the eulogy and burial, whenever and however that takes place.  It is not up to us, and it is better that we obey God than man.

 

Again, we are not retaliating against the cult!  It is called WARNING others of the dangers they face if they choose Life Changers International.  We are now 120 strong, that is more than the entire membership of those poor tired five to six days a week attending members that Howell has.  There is nothing wrong with warning others about abuse, inappropriate conduct towards children and women.  I came forward and reported what happened to me, and I am going to continue to whatever it takes to aid authorities, and help my sisters, and I don't care what you have to say about it.  All you are good for is lying on people, but the truth is out, and it is so stupid for you to keep coming on here and defending a lie, and the liar.

 

We are not cult, we are not a church, WE ARE FORMER MEMBERS OF THE CULT LIFE CHANGERS INTERNATIONAL, NEW HORIZON'S MINISTRY OF KAISERSLAUTERN, GERMANY.  Having a facebook account where former members can go and heal and discuss what happened to them is not a cult, but it makes you A LIE.  Authorities will know that I am telling the truth.

 

Here is another little tip for you Jones,  I am telling about this fixation that Howell has for these particular German women, HE CAN'T LET GO!  But he is going to leave them alone.  There is something pariticularly interesting about these six German Women that intimidates Howell, and I encourage them to come forward and telL authorities about whatever happened to them.  IT IS ALL ABUSE!  REPORT IT!

 

Lastly no talked "crap" about people's children, you just don't like the truth about camp disease.  You are afraid of the fact that one day you may have to face the same things you are now trying to defend.  At least, I can see a little humanity in you - that is good, there is hope for you.  As for the teen, we all know what it is like to be a teen, and kids will be kids. 

 

We don't need to go back through these posts, we know what we said, and anything said on this site is nothing compared to all the nasty things Howell has said about people over his stupid marble stump, and on the work network, so put that in your pipe and smoke it.

 

Good Night!

 

SO THAT'S WHO WANZO BROWN IS!

 

You mean Jones, is playing both sides of the road?  He is the one causing all the trouble for Howell.  Maybe he wants the top spot.

 

How is Jones a wounded warrior?  He's fat, he eats anything that won't move, I never saw him wounded.

 

Jones, a.k.a WANZO BROWN, are you going to bump off Howell and claim his apostleship?

focus on Jesus Christ.

Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell.  You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...

Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house

A number of key factors have been identified:

  • False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
  • Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
  • Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
  • False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases

Profile

Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]

The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content

What does God want to happen, that is the question.  That will be the reality.  We are doing our part, we are reporting Howell, we are praying and fasting against this destructive cult, upsetting Noble Son who lives in denial, and we will leave the results up to God.

 

Part of Howell´s deception is this David and Saul issue.  None of us are David or Saul, and we do not have to be afraid of reporting somone who has betrayed our trust, but someone who does not have an annoiting.

 

I wrote that Howell told all of us that we were to bring someone that needed a devil casted out to him.  Get rid of that lying spirit Colm-Howell of him - right now!  (smile)

focus on Jesus Christ.

Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell.  You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...

Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house

A number of key factors have been identified:

  • False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
  • Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
  • Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
  • False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases

Profile

Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]

The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content

Amen.

focus on Jesus Christ.

Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell.  You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...

Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house

A number of key factors have been identified:

  • False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
  • Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
  • Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
  • False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases

Profile

Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]

The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content

Make me a sign for good, that is, do that for me in my trouble which will be an evidence that thou doest favor me, and will save me.  Lord, be that obstacle in between me and those who oppose me, that they may see it, and be convince that you are God.  And, that you are my protector, and my friend, for I put my trust in you O Lord.

 

It is good to be accepted of the Lord.  The Bible tells us not to fret ourselves over evil doers, and not to be envious against the workers of inquity, for they shall soon be cut down like the grass and wither as the green herb.

 

That is an excellent scripture, it stating that those who hate the children of God may see his favor upon us, and be ashamed of their envy of us, their combination of conspiracies against God's people, and all their efforts to distress us, to hinder us of the Kingdom, or deprive us of it, or make us uncomfortable in it, are all in vain,

 

Praise God for our Solemn Assembly, we have one more day.  The Lord has done great things during the past two days, we are seeing a move of glory by the hand of God.  Be encouraged everyone! 

focus on Jesus Christ.

Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell.  You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...

Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house

A number of key factors have been identified:

  • False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
  • Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
  • Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
  • False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases

Profile

Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]

The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content

RSS

© 2024   Created by Raliegh Jones Jr..   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service