In my recent investigation of homeless ministries (with the hope of making a proposal to my pastor of how we can become involved), I find an interesting difference in philosophy regarding how to minister to the people. Some churches provide the homeless an opportunity to bathe, get their hair done, and recieve clean clothes before they attend their services. Although these options are not mandatory, other groups criticize them because, 1) there is subtle pressure upon the visitors to "clean up" first before they can join the congregation in the worship service, 2) it obscures or hides the presence of homeless people from the congregation. The critics advocate simply accepting the homeless into service as they are... and embracing them despite how they might look or smell... showing them how the love of Jesus doesn't fixate on or reject them because of personal hygiene.

Which approach do you think is better?

Views: 5

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think before a person wants to sit in a pew they themselves would like to have a bath. Or eat. Or shave.
Its restoring a bit of dignity back to them. I would think that a church that just has them sit and listen to the gospel is not fulfilling the whole mission.
Jesus fed the people that came to hear him preach.
Not only that I think it would behoove the church to feed and clothe them whether or not they attend the services.

I dont have a problem with the church taking care of the homeless' earthly needs.
There are some churches that will ONLY let them come sit in the pews but will not address their natural needs.

I say 'power' to them!!!!!
Very good answer Newview. Mission accomplished is the primary goal. Minister to all of their needs.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Raliegh Jones Jr..   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service