How would you define "inerrancy"? - Black Preaching Network2024-03-29T00:29:41Zhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/forum/topics/how-would-you-define-inerrancy?commentId=916966%3AComment%3A1943951&feed=yes&xn_auth=noBrother Watson I just picked…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-08-30:916966:Comment:25480682011-08-30T21:17:25.122ZPastor Rodrick Sweet,ThMhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/RodrickSweet
Brother Watson I just picked up that book at the local Half Price Books. Will start reading it this weekend. how have you been?
Brother Watson I just picked up that book at the local Half Price Books. Will start reading it this weekend. how have you been? How would you define "inerran…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-08-26:916966:Comment:25291892011-08-26T14:47:56.076ZJoseph Gillhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/JosephGill
<strong><em>How would you define "inerrancy"? What does it mean to say the bible in inerrant?</em></strong>
<strong><em>How would you define "inerrancy"? What does it mean to say the bible in inerrant?</em></strong> Yes it is and it only adds to…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-03-26:916966:Comment:19897672011-03-26T16:01:24.847ZPastor Rodrick Sweet,ThMhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/RodrickSweet
Yes it is and it only adds to one's love for the Word of God. I need to say thanks I will have to pick up a copy of that book.
Yes it is and it only adds to one's love for the Word of God. I need to say thanks I will have to pick up a copy of that book. Thanks, Pastor Sweet. The Dic…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-03-23:916966:Comment:19831662011-03-23T06:39:13.340ZJoseph Gillhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/JosephGill
Thanks, Pastor Sweet. The <em>Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation</em>, by Stanley E. Porter, had a great article on Paul's practice of "pearl-stringing" arguments. And I'll keep checking into this... it's very interesting.
Thanks, Pastor Sweet. The <em>Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation</em>, by Stanley E. Porter, had a great article on Paul's practice of "pearl-stringing" arguments. And I'll keep checking into this... it's very interesting. I'm not sure that there is an…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-03-22:916966:Comment:19811642011-03-22T16:58:02.824ZPastor Rodrick Sweet,ThMhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/RodrickSweet
I'm not sure that there is any Commentary on this that does not requires a more than intermediate Greek and Hebrew, It's better to look up pearl stringing to get a better understanding of. The NT is full of this and that is why I also believe in the doctrine of inerrancy! Hope that this helps.....<br/>
I'm not sure that there is any Commentary on this that does not requires a more than intermediate Greek and Hebrew, It's better to look up pearl stringing to get a better understanding of. The NT is full of this and that is why I also believe in the doctrine of inerrancy! Hope that this helps.....<br/> Pastor Sweet,
Thanks for weig…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-03-21:916966:Comment:19793912011-03-21T21:28:18.464ZJoseph Gillhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/JosephGill
<p>Pastor Sweet,</p>
<p>Thanks for weighing in, but you've got to take this a little slower...</p>
<p>How does <em>gezerah shawah</em> explain what appears to be an erroneous attribution of Zechariah's prophecy to Jeremiah?</p>
<p>Is there a simpler than seminary-level resource I can access to learn about this interpretive practice?</p>
<p>Pastor Sweet,</p>
<p>Thanks for weighing in, but you've got to take this a little slower...</p>
<p>How does <em>gezerah shawah</em> explain what appears to be an erroneous attribution of Zechariah's prophecy to Jeremiah?</p>
<p>Is there a simpler than seminary-level resource I can access to learn about this interpretive practice?</p> Yes! I think that the best wa…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-03-21:916966:Comment:19792832011-03-21T18:54:11.948ZPastor Rodrick Sweet,ThMhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/RodrickSweet
<p>Yes! I think that the best way to answer this is this way:</p>
<p align="center" style="text-align: left;"><b>Biblical Inerrancy</b></p>
<ul>
<li><u>Basic Definition</u><ul>
<li>Scripture is inerrant =df. (for any statement S, if scripture affirms S, then S is true).</li>
<li>Scripture speaks wholly truthfully; it makes no false claims.</li>
<li>The doctrine of inerrancy concerns the content of scripture’s claims. It does not concern whether errors of grammar or syntax appeared in the…</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Yes! I think that the best way to answer this is this way:</p>
<p align="center" style="text-align: left;"><b>Biblical Inerrancy</b></p>
<ul>
<li><u>Basic Definition</u><ul>
<li>Scripture is inerrant =df. (for any statement S, if scripture affirms S, then S is true).</li>
<li>Scripture speaks wholly truthfully; it makes no false claims.</li>
<li>The doctrine of inerrancy concerns the content of scripture’s claims. It does not concern whether errors of grammar or syntax appeared in the original autographs. Sometimes the author violates the rule of grammar on purpose. </li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>“The Bible is full of <u>Contradictions</u>”</p>
<p>Ex: To say that Author Ash is the greatest tennis player in the history of the game and then say that Author Ash is not the greatest player in the game is a contradiction.</p>
<p>Ex: There is precisely one God and there are precisely three divine persons.</p>
<p>Ex: There is no contradiction when Christians say “that Christ is fully human and fully divine.</p>
<p>Matthew 27:9-10</p>
<p>Matthew uses a common rabbinical interpretive practice known as gezerah shawah also known as (pearl-stringing). This involves stringing together several passages of</p>
<p>Scripture, based on similar vocabulary, to arrive at a reading which synthesizes the passages and treats them as a literary unit.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; font-size: 12pt; mso-bidi-language: HE;"> </span></p> Perhaps thinking people can a…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-03-04:916966:Comment:19439512011-03-04T06:47:02.450ZJoseph Gillhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/JosephGill
Perhaps thinking people can agree that the <font color="#033D21"><i>purpose</i></font> of scripture is not to teach history, geography, science, sociology, or anything other than revelation of God and His plan for salvation. Nonetheless, we incidentally encounter statements about history, geography, science and sociology within the pages of scripture... if we encounter a historical, geographical, scientific or sociological fact in scripture, should we automatically trust in its accuracy?
Perhaps thinking people can agree that the <font color="#033D21"><i>purpose</i></font> of scripture is not to teach history, geography, science, sociology, or anything other than revelation of God and His plan for salvation. Nonetheless, we incidentally encounter statements about history, geography, science and sociology within the pages of scripture... if we encounter a historical, geographical, scientific or sociological fact in scripture, should we automatically trust in its accuracy? Do you subscribe to the Deist…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-02-17:916966:Comment:19038802011-02-17T18:32:54.586ZJoseph Gillhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/JosephGill
Do you subscribe to the Deist view that God "designed the watch, wound it up, and then left it alone" (that the Creator is not directly involved with His creation) or the Natural Theology view that the God of Christianity (extremely active, as the bible describes him, in history) is the designer?
Do you subscribe to the Deist view that God "designed the watch, wound it up, and then left it alone" (that the Creator is not directly involved with His creation) or the Natural Theology view that the God of Christianity (extremely active, as the bible describes him, in history) is the designer? There is a belief called the…tag:abcpreachers.ning.com,2011-02-12:916966:Comment:18832112011-02-12T04:13:56.518ZEvangelist Joyce Murray Alimhttps://abcpreachers.ning.com/profile/EvangelistJoyceMurrayAlim
There is a belief called the watchmaker's theory. If someone is walking on the beach and finds a watch then he must assume from this evidence that there is a watchmaker. The same with the order in nature and the universe. There is too much order for simply a chance event that caused creation
There is a belief called the watchmaker's theory. If someone is walking on the beach and finds a watch then he must assume from this evidence that there is a watchmaker. The same with the order in nature and the universe. There is too much order for simply a chance event that caused creation