Dear sister Dawn Davidson,

You said:

“ So are women who are unable to bear children, or women who are unmarried and obediently therefore not bearing children, or even women who are married yet in agreement with their husbands by choice remaining childless, on a fast-track to hell? I mean no disrespect but the question does require an answer. It seems we are left with very few options. And what happens if we marry a man who is unable to give us children? What then, are we still the ones to go to hell for it? As a matter of fact, my best-friend who is married and by choice without children just delivered the Resurrection Day sermon at her church, will she go to hell twice then? Of course I am being facetious also but I am trying to get you to see how ridiculous it is…And if I am not a mother, then what? And if I cannot be a mother yet desire to be, please imagine the level of anguish saying something, or worse yet teaching something like this creates. Have you ever suffered with a woman through a miscarriage or with one unable to conceive? And yet you would say this is God? I don’t understand that.

Please, do not take me wrong!

I’ve never said that unmarried women and those who are unable to bear children will go to hell. I’ve never say that!

Women are called to be mothers. It is their attribute, their vocation. For example, a man will never be a mother.

Indeed the Bible clearly states that Adam “called his wife's name Eve; because she was [to be] the mother of all living”.

EVE WAS TO BE A MOTHER.

Let us listen to an extract of Deborah’s canticle:

“Village life in Israel ceased, ceased until I, Deborah, arose a mother in Israel.”

(Judges 5:7)

Deborah arose like a mother in Israel. Yes A MOTHER!

To be good mothers is the true position of the women in the Church of Jesus Christ. This is not a condition for them to be saved.

As good mothers they ought to teach what is good to their daughters.

“Likewise, teach the older women to be reverent in the way they live, not to be slanderers or addicted to much wine, but to teach what is good. Then they can train the younger women to love their husbands and children, to be self-controlled and pure, to be busy at home, to be kind, and to be subject to their husbands, so that no one will malign the word of God.”

Titus 2:3-5

Old women should not train the younger women to become pastors or to hold authority over men. But they should teach them to become also good mothers, loving their husbands and children, being self-controlled and pure, being busy at home, being kind, and being subject to their husbands.

Women, this is your role as members of the body of Christ. You have many things to do. Then do not usurp the role of the men.

Not only you must teach the younger women but also your behavior owes to be a preaching for your husbands:

“Wives, in the same way be submissive to your husbands so that, if any of them do not believe the word, they may be won over without words by the behavior of their wives, when they see the purity and reverence of your lives. Your beauty should not come from outward adornment, such as braided hair and the wearing of gold jewelry and fine clothes. Instead, it should be that of your inner self, the unfading beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which is of great worth in God's sight. For this is the way the holy women of the past who put their hope in God used to make themselves beautiful. They were submissive to their own husbands, like Sarah, who obeyed Abraham and called him her master. You are her daughters if you do what is right and do not give way to fear.

1 Peter 3:1-6

This is the truth !

Indeed Brother Paul said:

“But women will be saved through childbearing-if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety”

1 Timothy 2:15

Please, listen: women will be saved… if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.

Of course, faith, love and holiness with propriety are the conditions for women to be saved.

Childbearing or to be a mother is a vocation, an attribute (through childbearing) of the women.

All the women are called to be mothers, and they will be saved if they continue in faith, love and holiness with propriety.

Do you understand clearly Brother Paul’s statement now?

Please, do not take me wrong!

I’ve never said that unmarried women and those who are unable to bear children will go to hell. I’ve
never say that!

Views: 15

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Sister Dawn, you said again:

“…If the garden story has any authority at all then Bro. Paul was mistaken in submitting to the traditional interpretation of this word”.

Please, do not take me wrong. I’ve never said that the garden story has any authority at all. However, the problem lies in the fact that you misunderstand the garden story.

You said again:

“Clearly from my own writings I believe he was mistaken, he was in fact highly mistaken regarding his own understanding of the garden word. I am sorry, I do not worship the words of Paul only the God who gave the word which even Paul first received. Whatever Paul says must also line up with the accurate interpretation of the garden. He was wrong by not correctly stating that Adam was not only the first to be deceived, and not only the first fallen person in the earth, but also that Adam was the only fallen and un-confessed person emerging from the garden! Do I have a hard time believing that the mind of a first century man (even of Paul) in this area could be mistaken in such matters? Absolutely not”… But is it right to dismiss what was in the actual mind of God within the garden and to instead exalt the words of a man, yes even Paul, which don’t themselves seem to line up with previous scripture in order to support our own agenda’s?”

Dear sister, my God enlighten you!

WAS BROTHER PAUL MISTAKEN?

Indeed, the Bible declares:

“For prophecy never had its origin in the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit”.

2 Peter 1:21

Dear sister, if you have rejected the teaching of the Apostle Paul, then you have rejected Jesus Christ Himself.

Because the Lord has ordered us to receive the Word by the ministry of those He has sent: “"He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me."

Luke 10:16

So then, we ought to regard Brother Paul as a servant of Christ and as one entrusted with the secret things of God. Amen! (1 Corinthians 4:1).

Indeed Brother Paul told Thessalonians:

“And we also thank God continually because, when you received the word of God, which you heard from us, you accepted it not as the word of men, but as it actually is, the word of God, which is at work in you who believe”.

1 Thessalonians 2:13

DID YOU RECEIVE THE WORD OF GOD WHICH YOU HEARD FROM PAUL (1Timothy 2: 11-15, 1 Corinthians 14:33-38)?

DID YOU ACCEPT IT AS THE WORD OF A MAN?

May God open your eyes!

Dear sister, Brother Paul tells you this:

“If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord. But if any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant ».

1 Corinthians 14:37-38

Dear sister, Brother Paul tells you this:

“But if even *we* or an angel out of heaven announce as glad tidings to you [anything] besides what we have announced as glad tidings to you, let him be accursed... »

Galatians 1:8

Dear sister, Brother Paul tells you this:

« …For we are God's fellow-workmen; ye are God's husbandry, God's building. According to the grace of God which has been given to me, as a wise architect, I have laid the foundation, but another builds upon it. But let each see how he builds upon it. For other foundation can no man lay besides that which [is] laid, which is Jesus Christ… »

1 Corinthians 3:9-11

Dear sister, Brother Paul tells you this:

« Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but by Jesus Christ, and God the Father, who raised him from the dead) »

Galatians 1:1

Dear sister, Brother Paul tells you this:

« But I certify you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached of me is not after man. For I neither received it of man, neither was I taught it, but by the revelation of Jesus Christ.

Galatians 1:11-12

Dear sister, please do not go beyond which is written! Do not do that!

« And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye might learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another… »

1 Corinthians 4:1-6

Dear sister, please do not distort the word of God for your own destruction!

Indeed, Brother Peter says that the Apostle Paul’s “letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction ».

2 Peter 3:16

The Bible declares:

« For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables ».

2 Timothy 4:3-4

Dear sister, with all due respect, I would like to tell you that you have turned away your ears from the truth, and you have been turned unto fables!

Yes, your so called « Garden story » doctrine is really a fable!

You do not know the Scriptures! May God enlighten you!

So, let us scrutinize the Garden story!

You say that your ministry is specifically regarding the garden word

Then, which kind of ministry you have! Are you specialized in a cemetery (seminary), or a biblical institute?
Indeed, a true ministry that comes from God must be a full ministry, “For the one whom God has sent speaks the words of God, for God gives the Spirit without limit (John 3:34).

God gives the Spirit without limit. Amen!

Specializations and ecclesiastic degrees originate from the cemeteries (seminaries), the biblical institutes or the broken cisterns that cannot hold water (Jeremiah 2:13-14).

Question: Was “Adam not only the first to be deceived, and not only the first fallen person in the earth, but also the only fallen and un-confessed person emerging from the garden?”

WHO WAS ADAM?

ADAM was made directly by God from the dust of the earth.
In Genesis 2:7 we read, “And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.”

Adam was not born of a woman. He was the first human. In l Corinthians 15:45 we read, “And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul.” Adam was the first man.
God said, “Let us make man in Our image, after Our likeness.” And the Lord God formed man out of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
So God created man in His own image. Adam was an original creature, better, ADAM WAS SON OF GOG (Luke 3:38)
This is an important point by the way, there were no other human beings made alongside Adam.
“The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."

Genesis 2:18

“And the Lord God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof; And the rib, which the Lord God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man. And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called WOMAN, because she was taken out of Man.”

Genesis 2: 21

And God said, “A man shall leave his father and his mother and cling to his wife: and they shall be one flesh".

The first woman (the first wife) was made directly from part of Adam. She was not born of a woman either. Adam and Eve were unique. They had evidence that they were the first two people.

The WOMAN is a helper suitable for the MAN.

Indeed, ADAM WAS THE IMAGE AND GLORY OF GOD, BUT EVE WAS THE GLORY OF ADAM.
ADAM DID NOT COME FROM EVE, BUT EVE FROM ADAM, NEITHER WAS ADAM CREATED FOR EVE, BUT EVE FOR ADAM.

This truth can be seen through the following passage:

“A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; neither was man created for woman, but woman for man.

1 Corinthians 11:7-9

Thus, God created them male and female. God named the first man Adam; then later Adam called the woman, Eve.
Genesis 3:20 states: “And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was [to be] the mother of all living.”

Dear sister Dawn said:

“First understand, Eve was a fallen but confessed and rewarded by God female (she was rewarded by God through the mouth of a now compelled Adam in both name and title in Genesis 3:20), she was not punished as was an un-confessed Adam…And finally, why would God curse a female that he himself honored post-fall in both name and title (Genesis 3:20)? How fickle would He be, to put it kindly”.

Now, I would like to ask some questions to you:

The Bible states that God named the first man Adam, why didn’t God also name directly the female before the fall?

Simply because the woman was created for the man.

Adam said: she shall be called WOMAN, because she was taken out of Man.

Simply because Adam was entitled to name all the living creatures:

“Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the air and all the beasts of the field. But for Adam no suitable helper was found”.

Genesis 2:19-20

“He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name”.

Since the suitable helper found by Adam was also a living creature, then Adam was entitled to name her also. He said, she shall be called WOMAN because she was taken out of Man.

ADAM was entitled to name his helper before the fall.

Now, after the fall, why didn’t God Himself named directly the woman?

And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was [to be] the mother of all living.

Here we see that God had not withdrawn the right for Adam to name the living creatures including his wife.

If you assert that the name or the title “EVE” was a reward given by God to Eve, you must also be honest to recognize that it was a reward or an honor given to EVE through Adam, her head.

It was not given directly to Eve but to her head, her Chief Adam and the latter “called his wife's name Eve; because she was [to be] the mother of all living”.

Was Adam compelled to call his wife’s name Eve?

Nowhere in the Bible can you find a single verse which supports this erroneous view.

I challenge you to show me a biblical passage proving that Adam was compelled to call his wife’s name Eve.

I challenge you to show me a biblical passage proving that the name Eve was a reward or an honor given by God to Eve.

Adam was entitled to name her and he did it so. Moreover the name EVE meant that she WAS TO BE THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING.

Please, show me, where is the HONOR?

Please, show me, where is the REWARD?

If child bearing is a reward, then you must recognize that the same reward has been bestowed upon all the women today according to 1 Timothy 2:15

Do you think that the name “WOMAN” was more important than the name “EVE?”

To what extent?

I challenge you to provide a biblical passage proving that Eve was fallen but confessed!

Where did you see Eve’s confession or repentance?

I challenge you to provide a biblical passage proving that Adam was fallen but un-confessed!

Does the Bible clearly say that Adam died impenitent?

Dear sister Dawn, be careful!

The word of God is not a human theory. It’s not a human philosophy. The Word of God needs no interpretation. God is His own Interpreter.

Let us learn to speak when the Bible speaks and keep silent when the Bible is silent on a given matter.

Please, do not go beyond what is written!

Please, do not do that?

Indeed, Brother Paul said:

“Now, brothers, I have applied these things to myself and Apollos for your benefit, so that you may learn from us the meaning of the saying, "Do not go beyond what is written." Then you will not take pride in one man over against another”.

1 Corinthians 4:6

What really happened in the Garden?

In the middle of the garden stood two trees: The Tree of Life and The Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil.
And the Lord put man in the garden of Eden to care for everything in it.

Then the Lord God commanded, “You may eat freely from every tree of the garden except for The Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil.You must never eat from that tree. In the day that you do, you will surely die.”

God showed his love for Adam and Eve, by giving them all they needed and more to enjoy life to its fullest.

He also gave them the ability to make choices, and He gave these ancestors of all humankind an opportunity to use this ability wisely. God wanted Adam and Eve to show their respect by obeying His one command, to not eat from just that one tree. Everything else was theirs to enjoy.

To live in peace and happiness in their beautiful garden, Adam and Eve needed only to trust God's wisdom, and respect His authority over them. They should have been grateful for life and happy in their freedom, but freedom to choose does not bring happiness when bad choices are made.

Long before God created humans, He also gave freedom of choice to the angels He had created. God desired honor from these angels, who inhabit the spirit realm, just as He desired honor from people.

Most angels did choose to follow God, and even today these angels worship the Lord and carry out his bidding, helping people in many ways. But other angels made a bad choice. Lucifer's arrogance and pride caused him to lose the honored position above God's throne.

Lucifer fell from heaven for his rebellion, because he had challenged God by saying in his heart, “I will elevate my throne above the stars of God: I will be like the most High God.”

Lucifer, known also in the Bible as the Devil or Satan, desires worship which belongs only to God. Satan deceives people in order to obtain that worship, even masquerading as a beautiful angel of light, but his lies and his false religions cause pain - and suffering -and destruction.

Adam was told he could not eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Genesis 2:17).

Therefore, if Adam, being the head of the human race, disobeyed, all of his descendants would have to suffer the consequences.

Eve was the one tempted by the serpent, and the one who first ate the forbidden fruit (Genesis 3:6; 1 Timothy 2: 13-15).

“The man said, "The woman you put here with me - she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it." Then the LORD God said to the woman, "What is this you have done?" The woman said, "The serpent deceived me, and I ate."

Genesis 3:12-13

Then the LORD God said to the woman, "What is this you have done?

So, Brother Paul was not mistaken. He was not wrong by stating that Adam was not the first to be deceived. Eve was the first to be deceived. Please read Genesis 3:6. It is so said the Bible.

Even though Eve was the one tempted by the serpent, and the one who first ate the forbidden fruit, Adam is the one who brought sin into the world, because he was the head of the human race and the one to whom the commandment had first been given.

His was guilty because he was the head of Eve, the head of the Garden.. Yes, the man is the head of the woman (1 Corinthians 11:3).

However, he fell from this responsibility for having listened to his wife and ate from the tree about which God commanded him saying: “You must not eat of it”

This is the truth!

Please, “do not add to his words, or he will rebuke you and prove you a liar”.

Proverbs 30:6

“To Adam He said, "Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, 'You must not eat of it,' "Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life.”

Genesis 3:17

Of course, even though Eve was the one tempted by the serpent, and the one who first ate the forbidden fruit, Adam is the one who brought sin into the world, because he was the head of the human race and the one to whom the commandment had first been given.

This is the reason why Romans 5:12 states: “Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.”

Because of this sin of rebelling against God's law, God cursed the ground (Genesis 3:17), caused thorns and thistles to come forth (Genesis 3:1 8), and introduced death into the world - Adam and Eve died spiritually, and started to die physically.

I challenge you to provide a biblical passage proving that Eve was fallen but confessed!

Where did you see Eve’s confession or repentance?

Why had the so called “confessed” EVE to die physically also?

Why had EVE to die physically?

After her confession, why didn’t God who rewarded her and honored her by compelling Adam to name EVE forgive her also?

Why?

You said: “…First understand, Eve was a fallen but confessed and rewarded by God female (she was rewarded by God through the mouth of a now compelled Adam in both name and title in Genesis 3:20), she was not punished as was an un-confessed Adam”.

I challenge you to provide a biblical passage proving that Adam was fallen but un-confessed!

Does the Bible clearly says that Adam died impenitent?

Dear sister, you said: “Keep in mind also when you quote Genesis 2:24 it was the flesh of Adam alone that was rejected not Eve’s”

However, let me tell you that both Adam and Eve died spiritually, and started to die physically.

The first physical death recorded is that of at least one animal when “unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins, end clothed them.” God killed an animal, and shed blood, and gave a covering to Adam and Eve. This is a beautiful picture of something special to come - that shed blood would be a covering because of sin.
Hebrews 9:22 states that “without shedding of blood [there] is no remission.” God requires the shedding of blood for the remission of sins. However, the blood of bulls and goats was not good enough. Because a man brought sin into the world, a man needed to atone - but it had to be a perfect man. If all descendants of Adam now suffered from sin, how could this be accomplished?

God provided a second Adam - a perfect Adam who could be the perfect sacrifice. God himself came to earth as a man.
Indeed, the Bible clearly states that Adam was a pattern of the one to come (Romans 5:14).

Sister, you said:” Keep in mind also when you quote Genesis 2:24 it was the flesh of Adam alone that was rejected not Eve’s”

But why doesn’t the Bible clearly state that the so-called confessed Eve was a pattern of the one to come?

Why?
Dear sister dawn, your opinion about EVE resembles the doctrine of those who worship Mary by raising or exhalting her over Jesus Christ!

You are free to promote Eve, creating a doctrine on her, but you should not rise EVE above Adam. This is not scriptural.

Jesus Christ was born of a woman to become a man so that the perfect sacrifice could be made. Jesus was God, but He was also man as God intended man to be-sinless. He was crucified on the cross of Calvary. He shed His blood and paid the penalty for our sins, and was raised from the dead, conquering death, the judgment which God had brought upon man because of sin.

That is why Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15:20-22: “But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the first fruits of them that slept. For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.”

We read further in 1 Corinthians 15:45-47:

“So it is written: "The first man Adam became a living being"; the last Adam, a life-giving spirit. The spiritual did not come first, but the natural, and after that the spiritual. The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven”.

1 Corinthians 15:45-47

First Corinthians 15:26 states: “The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death.” Death is swallowed up in victory, Paul says. And we can say with him, “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?” (1 Corinthians 15:55).

Christ has paid the penalty. The last Adam has conquered death and provided a means of deliverance from the first Adam's fall into sin, resulting in separation from God.

Dear sister Dawn, you said:

“This is the beginning of Adam's deception before the female. However, such issues are of an even greater magnitude because not only did Adam reject the will of God in his own name and seek to take that in the garden which did not belong to him in a name, but he also elected to deny the female what was to be her name (as even desired and purposed by God in her creation) as "Eve." Adam was also present in 3:1-6 yet did not to correct thoughts held by the female that the fruit could not be either touched or eaten. Both a silent Adam and the serpent knew the truth only Eve (or now still "Woman") did not. Adam desired the fruit for himself which is the only reason why he did not interfere during the fall of the female right before his eyes. Adam's problem was this, he did not fully believe God and doubted whether or not eating the fruit would surely bring out death. Therefore, why not allow the female to eat it first. If she died then he would at least be rid of one for whom he really did not care for. Yet if she lived then at least he also would know that it was safe for him to also eat of the fruit… »”

Let me tell you that the story above is a fable. It’s your own interpretation of the Word of God.

Indeed, “The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh;

she shall be called 'woman, for she was taken out of man."

Genesis 2:23

However, you said: “…Therefore, why not allow the female to eat it first. If she died then he would at least be rid of one for whom he really did not care for”.

Was Adam the enemy of EVE? How can Adam refuse to take care of the one who is bone of his bones, flesh of his flesh?

How can a man unite to his wife (they become one flesh) according to Genesis 2:24 and at the same time he refuses to take care of her?

Let me tell you that Adam fell from his responsibility for having listened to his wife and ate from the tree about which God commanded him saying: “You must not eat of it”.

The doubt and the first sin came from EVE according to the Bible.

As for Adam, he sinned for having listened to EVE his wife.

Adam sinned for having listened to his wife.

The Bible does not report any other complaint from God against Adam.

Your statement above is a fable, nothing but a fable.

You said: “…This in fact is why God chastises Adam in 3:17. Yes it is taught that God rebukes Adam for obeying, (hearkening) unto to his wife, but from the reality of what we now know, we can recognize that God knew what we did not all along. And that is that Adam remained silent in an effort to ascertain whether or not God was a liar and whether or not he in fact was safe to eat of the fruit. Adam did this at what could have been the very expense of Eve's physical life as well. That is, Adam "hearkened unto the voice" of his still living wife, yet not in obedience but in blind self service only. At this moment in the mind of Adam, God was in fact a liar…”
“Yes it is taught that God rebukes Adam for obeying, (hearkening) unto to his wife, but from the reality of what we now know, we can recognize that God knew what we did not all along”

Sister, let me tell you that your so called reality is a fable. Do you intend to insinuate here again that the writer of the book of Genesis was mistaken?

Where did you find this revelation which doesn’t line up with the Holy Scriptures?

Dear sister, please hear the worry of Brother Paul:

“But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent's cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ”.

2 Corinthians 11:3

Sister Dawn, it sounds like you have been deceived by the Devil as Eve was.

I pray that your minds may not somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ.

May God open your eyes?

Sister Dawn, you said:

“My position is that after the fall, Eve came to fully understand all that was perpetrated against her by the enemy through Adam. The only thing they really had in the garden was identity and truth, the two very things that a disobedient Adam thought nothing of lying, suppressing and manipulating to benefit his own ends”.

Sister, EVE was not deceived by ADAM, but she was deceived by the serpent's cunning.

The Bible doesn’t state that the enemy perpetrated something against Eve through Adam.

This is not written in my Bible. This is a lie, a fable.

This is what the Bible truly says:

“Then the LORD God said to the woman, "What is this you have done?"
The woman said, "The serpent deceived me, and I ate."

Genesis 3:13

She didn’t say: “the serpent deceived me through ADAM, and I ate” BUT SHE SAID THE SERPENT DECEIVED ME AND I ATE”.

If so then, why all your admonitions against Adam?

Why?

Please, repent, otherwise God will hold you accountable for your false teaching.

Please, do not mislead the women! Please stop your false teaching, time is up!

Sister Dawn, you said again:

“Yet in Genesis 3:12 what does Adam confess? He confesses nothing worth having. All he really does is lodge accusation in the face of God and says nothing about what was really true in that garden according to his actions. And this why Adam was punished and a fully confessed Eve was not. By the way, God accepted the confession of Eve which means, she was but only deceived in the garden, the lie regarding whether or not the fruit could be both touched and eaten could not have come therefore from her. It originated with a selfish, power-hungry Adam…”

Sister, when I read carefully your charges against Adam, I have the impression that you assimilate Adam to the serpent who deceived Eve, Worse, Adam seems to be more wicked, more cruel, more culpable than Satan himself.

Is this your teaching?

EVE SAID: “THE SERPENT DECEIVED ME AND I ATE”

However, according to the new revelation or the new reality of Sister Dawn, the writer of the book of the Genesis would rather say:

1- The sin originated with a selfish, power-hungry Adam

2- Then serpent deceived Eve through Adam

Dear sister, the Bible declares that God created man in His own image. Adam was an original creature, better, ADAM WAS SON OF GOG (Luke 3:38).

He could never be a vehicle of the Devil to deceive Eve, never!

EVE was not deceived by ADAM, but she was deceived by the serpent's cunning (2 Corinthians 11:3).

The Bible doesn’t state that the enemy perpetrated something against Eve through Adam.

Eve was the first to be deceived. Please read Genesis 3:6. It is so said the Bible.

Even though Eve was the one tempted by the serpent, and the one who first ate the forbidden fruit, Adam is the one who brought sin into the world, because he was the head of the human race and the one to whom the commandment had first been given.

His was guilty because he was the head of Eve, the head of the Garden. Yes, the man is the head of the woman (1 Corinthians 11:3).

He fell from this responsibility for having listened to his wife and ate from the tree about which God commanded him saying: “You must not eat of it”

This is the truth!

Sister, really, your teaching is a fable.

You said:

“…For this reason, to rightly interpret the garden word one is sure to fail if purposed to do so without complete regard for the Foreknowledge of God and if from anything other than the God-Perspective alone. We serve a God who knows all things at all times. Keeping this in mind, we must never imagine that God experienced the garden story in real time (so to speak) as we ourselves experience this garden saga according to the read of the human mind. Given this, the very voice of God in the garden is our compass. That is, what God and only what God alone speaks, sets the standard for rightly evaluating truth. Relevant to our discussion then, when if ever is it right to set the knowledge and truth standard of God aside and instead operate and receive “truth” as given from the mind of an unchecked Adam? Specifically, do you believe Adam in the garden story or do you believe God?...”

Sister Dawn, despite the above statement, your teaching is an imagination based on men traditions.

Your teaching is far from the God-perspective, far from the truth standard of God.

Unfortunately, I realize that the very voice of God in the garden is not your compass, since you openly deny
what is truly written in the book of Genesis by saying that the serpent deceived Eve through Adam.

Yes, I realize that the very voice of God in the garden is not your compass, since you openly deny what is truly written in the book of Genesis by saying that the enemy perpetrated something against Eve through Adam.

Truly speaking, your garden story doctrine is a fable, even a poison.

Indeed you said:

“…God purposed and gave the man the name of “Adam”. (Genesis 2:19) Adam sought to rename himself “Man,” but God still called him “Adam.” (Genesis 2:23 and Genesis 3:9)
Adam sought to call the female “Woman” but God compelled the name of “Eve” from a now punished Adam. (Genesis 2:23 and Genesis 3:20).

Sister Dawn, are you really telling what really happened in the Garden or are you telling a tale?

Can you provide a single biblical passage proving that:

1- Adam sought to rename himself “Man”?

2-Adam sought to call the female “Woman” but God compelled the name of “Eve” from a now punished Adam?

I realize that the very voice of God in the garden is not your compass, rather you are telling a tale.

Sister Dawn, you said:

“God instructed Adam to only not “eat” from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil” but to otherwise “dress” and “keep” the garden (Genesis 2:15). Could an obedient Adam “dress” and “keep” fallen fruit which he could not touch? (I speak specifically now regarding fruit belonging to the tree of the knowledge of good and evil). And if Adam engaged in “keeping” the fruit according to the command of God, then where did, (a future honored by God) Eve’s idea of not even being able to “touch” this fruit (Genesis 3:3) come from? And when she spoke these words, why did a present Adam remain silent? 6. Adam was present during the temptation of Eve (Genesis 3:6) yet did not correct her words to the serpent and was later punished by God for “hearkening” (that is responding) to the (stilll living) voice of one whom Adam surely thought would likely die from eating the fruit (Genesis 3:17). That is, God understood the evil really perpetrated by an Adam who only then responded (and not at a time when he could have saved Eve) and also freely ate of the fruit, do you?”

Of course, Adam was present during the temptation of Eve (Genesis 3:6).

To some extent, we can say that Adam failed to “keep” the fallen fruit which he could not touch since he was the head of the Garden. Indeed God put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it according to Genesis 2:15.

However, let us notice that Adam was the one to whom the commandment had first been given. Eve was not present when God commanded Adam to eat freely from every tree of the garden except for The Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil:

“And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."

Genesis 2:16-17

Now, how did Eve later become aware of what God had already told Adam?

Certainly, her husband Adam had told her. Adam had warned her because he loved her. Adam did not hate Eve, otherwise he would not have warned her.

Thus, Eve after being warned could say:

"…We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden, but God did say, 'You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.' "

Genesis 3:2-3

Let us recognize here that Adam was a conscientious husband who was concerned by the happiness of his wife, so he performed his duty towards her, getting her informed of God's warning, preventing her from dying.

Dear sister Dawn, It’s true that Adam was present during the temptation of Eve.

Adam and Eve needed only to trust God's wisdom, and respect His authority over them.

But, let us notice that both Adam and Eve had the freedom to choose.

God created humans, and He also gave them freedom of choice.

Dear sister Dawn, a woman has the freedom of choice as her husband.

EVE had the freedom of choice and she was alone responsible for the acts she had committed, otherwise God would be unjust to punish her too.

God is just in all His ways.

The duty of Adam was to get her informed of God's warning, preventing her from dying. As for Eve, she had the freedom to choose and was held accountable for her acts.

If she were totally innocent, why then had God punished her too?

Indeed, our Lord does not kill the righteous with the wicked. He does not treat the righteous and the wicked alike (Genesis 18:25)

If Eve were totally innocent, if she were not guilty at all, then why did God punish her too?

If Eve were totally innocent, if she were not guilty at all, then why did she have to die also?

EVE was not deceived by ADAM, but she was deceived by the serpent's cunning.

The Bible doesn’t state that the enemy perpetrated something against Eve through Adam.

Why had the so called “confessed” EVE to die physically also?

Why had EVE to die physically?

After her confession, why didn’t God who rewarded her and honored her by compelling Adam to name Eve forgive her also?

Why had the so called “confessed” EVE to die physically also?

Why?

By asserting that Eve has confessed, you acknowledge that she had sinned. In other words, she should not do what she did. She should not be deceived by the serpent. She had to listen to the counsel of God which had been transmitted to her by Adam. She had the freedom of choice.

But she has been deceived and she doubted. Let us recognize that in the Garden, doubt and sin came first from EVE.

Let us see the case of Sarah, and our father Abraham for it is a beautiful picture:

“Then the LORD said, "I will surely return to you about this time next year, and Sarah your wife will have a son." Now Sarah was listening at the entrance to the tent, which was behind him”

Genesis 18:10

Sarah was present while our Lord was making the promise to Abraham. Yes, Sarah was listening at the entrance to the tent, which was behind him. She was aware of God’s promise.

God also gave both Sarah and Abraham the ability to make choices. He gave them an opportunity to use this ability wisely. God wanted both Abraham and Sarah to show their FAITH by TRUSTING His promise.

However, “…Sarah laughed to herself as she thought, "After I am worn out and my master is old, will I now have this pleasure?" Then the LORD said to Abraham, "Why did Sarah laugh and say, 'Will I really have a child, now that I am old?' Is anything too hard for the LORD? I will return to you at the appointed time next year and Sarah will have a son." Sarah was afraid, so she lied and said, "I did not laugh." But he said, "Yes, you did laugh."

Genesis 18:12-15

Sarah not only doubted but also sinned by lying. Let us recognize that in this case, doubt and sin came first from Sarah, the woman, but this did not prevent God's promise from being fulfilled. Amen!

Nevertheless, Abraham kept the faith, he still trusted God.

Abraham could never prevent Sarah from doubting, she had the freedom of
choice.

Abraham could never prevent Sarah from lying, she had the freedom of
choice.

Abraham could not correct her words. She was free to trust God or doubt about His promise.

Here, we can not say that the devil really perpetrated something by Abraham against Sarah, but Sarah has been deceived, then she doubted, she laughed and she lied.

We can not also say that the devil really perpetrated something by Adam against Eve, but Eve has been deceived, then she doubted, and ate from the Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil.

God punished Adam for having hearkened the voice of his wife and also ate from the Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Yes, it is not always wise to listen to the saying of the women, for Satan deceives them easily. So, we must discern what they say, and keep only what is good for fear of sinning against God.

Because, God punished Adam for having hearkened the voice of his wife and also ate from the Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Abram also had hearkened the voice of Sarai his wife before, however the saying of Sarai was not in line with the will or the promise of God.

“so she said to Abram, "The LORD has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my maidservant; perhaps I can build a family through her." Abram agreed to what Sarai said. So after Abram had been living in Canaan ten years, Sarai his wife took her Egyptian maidservant Hagar and gave her to her husband to be his wife”.

Genesis 16:2-3

As for Job, he has been very careful for having unveiled and refuted the trick of satan through the mouth of his his wife:

“His wife said to him, "Are you still holding on to your integrity? Curse God and die!" He replied, "You are talking like a foolish woman. Shall we accept good from God, and not trouble?" In all this, Job did not sin in what he said".

Job 2:9-10

Dear sister Dawn, according to the examples above, we see that the devil really perpetrated tricks by women against men. Women were the first to be deceived, then, satan used them to induce their husbands into error.

And the devil will always perpetrate tricks by women against the servants of God:

"Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess. By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols".

Revelation 2:20

This is what really happened in the garden of Eden.

The devil really perpetrated something by Eve against Adam.

Eve has been deceived first, then she doubted, and ate from the Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil.

Then, God punished Adam for having hearkened the voice of his wife and also ate from the Tree of The Knowledge of Good and Evil.

“ When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it”.

Genesis 3:6

“To Adam he said, "Because you listened to your wife and ate from the tree about which I commanded you, 'You must not eat of it,' "Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life”.

Genesis 3:17

Dear sister Dawn, this is the truth. Please, stop believing the lies and the fables!

Indeed, Brother Paul said:

“if I am delayed, you will know how people ought to conduct themselves in God's household, which is the church of the living God, the pillar and foundation of the truth”.

1 Timothy 3:15

Now, Genesis 3:20 states: “And Adam called his wife's name Eve; because she was [to be] the mother of all living.”

Adam was entitled to name her and he did it so. Moreover the name EVE meant that she WAS TO BE THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING.

WAS THE NAME "EVE" AN HONOR OR A REWARD FROM GOD?

My message above is the literal explanation of what occurred in the Garden of Eden.

I do invite you to search and read my message entitled “THE ORIGINAL SIN” and you will understand the true meaning of the Garden story.

You will also know why EVE WAS TO BE THE MOTHER OF ALL LIVING.

May God enlighten you!

Blessings,

Brother Germain

www.tagworld.com/srobouay
www.myspace.com/wawesan
THE EMERGING GARDEN STORY DOCTRINE IS JUST A FABLE
AMEN!
The false teacher Dawn Davidson is back !!!!!

Indeed she wondered:

“Two Spoke Against Moses, and even Against the Ethiopian Woman, but only One was Punished by a Just God, Why?”

To understand very well the false teaching above, one must at first consult the study of sister Dawn Davidson’s “GARDEN STORY DOCTRINE”

Sister Dawn Davidson, remember, one day you’ve said this:

“Yet in Genesis 3:12 what does Adam confess? He confesses nothing worth having. All he really does is lodge accusation in the face of God and says nothing about what was really true in that garden according to his actions. And this why Adam was punished and a fully confessed Eve was not. By the way, God accepted the confession of Eve which means, she was but only deceived in the garden, the lie regarding whether or not the fruit could be both touched and eaten could not have come therefore from her. It originated with a selfish, power-hungry Adam…”

Sister, in your message above you assert that Miriam was a LEADER endowed with an heavier RESPONSIBILITY simply because she has been PUNISHED.

As for Aron , he was WEAK because he has not been punished.

Sister we also notice that ADAM WAS PUNISHED.

So if the PUNISHMENT is the clue of the responsibility bestowed into someone, why do you refuse to admit that ADAM WAS THE LEADER in the Eden Garden?

The Bible declares:

« For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables ».

2 Timothy 4:3-4

Dear sister, with all due respect, I would like to tell you that you have turned away your ears from the truth, and you have been turned unto fables!

Blessings,

Bro. Germain

RSS

© 2021   Created by Raliegh Jones Jr..   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service