"GOD IS LOVE" 1John 4:8

[William Wilbur]

"GOD IS LOVE" 1John 4:8

How many believe it?

Do YOU believe it?

Not if you also believe
that God will torture the majority of mankind
unmercifully in real fire for ALL eternity, you don’t

1Tim 2:4
"For this is good and acceptable
in the sight of God our Saviour:
Who WILL HAVE ALL MEN TO BE SAVED,
and to come unto the knowledge of the truth"

ONLY Christians
(lead by Christian theologians, clergymen, pastors, and teachers)
that teach the whole world that Jesus Christ,
the Saviour of the Whole World (1John 4:14),
WILL NOT SAVE THE WHOLE WORLD

That he only "wants and wishes"
that he could save the whole world

It is ..ONLY.. THEY,
who teach the world that this prophecy
in 1Tim 2:4 will NEVER COME TO PASS

By the way, God NEVER, EVER
"wishes" or "hopes" for ANYTHING!

He "desires" things that absolutely
are certain to come about,
but God never wishes or hopes for things
that may or may not come about

Consider this:

Suppose 1Tim 2:3-4 did not say what is in our Bibles,
but suppose it said the following:

"For this is good and acceptable
in the sight of God our Saviour;

Who will ..NOT.. have all men to be saved,
and to come unto the knowledge of the truth"

Would not every single detractor who teaches
that God will NOT save all humanity
then use this Scripture to
PROVE THAT GOD WILL NOT SAVE ALL MEN?

YES OF COURSE THEY WOULD!
YOU KNOW THEY WOULD!

They would be delighted
to show from the Scriptures a statement
saying that God "WILL NOT" save all men?

And this Scripture would then
be the one most profound statements
in all Scripture to back up their doctrine
that all men will NOT be saved

This would be their "proof text"
that God most assuredly
WILL NOT save all men

Now then,

the ONLY difference between the fabricated verse above
and the real verse found in all Bibles in 1 Tim 2:3-4
is the addition of the word "not"

So if the addition of the word "NOT"
would prove that God will not save all men,

then the deletion of the word "NOT"
would have to prove that God WILL save all men

So if this verse had said that
God "WILL NOT" save all men,

then it would definitely mean
that all men will NOT be saved!!

I don’t think there is a theologian alive
who would deny that!

But here is the unbelievable irony of their teaching:

since it says that God
"WILL have all men to be saved"

(according to theologians),
this phrase also
MEANS THAT GOD WILL NOT SAVE ALL MEN!

Now,Imagine

if 1 Tim 2:3-4 really did say that
"God will NOT save all men,"

and then I would try to argue
(using the same stupid scholarship as theologians use)

that this verse doesn’t really mean
that God will NOT save all men,

but that it means
He only "DESIRES" that all men "NOT" be saved

when in reality they WILL all be saved,
even if God were to say
He "will NOT" save all men

Would not my detractors try to laugh me to scorn
over such inane reasoning?

OF COURSE THEY WOULD!
YOU KNOW THEY WOULD!
EVEN THEY KNOW THEY WOULD

Well, guess what?

The word "NOT" is NOT in this verse

So God really "WILL save ALL men!"

Ask a hundred pastors or theologians
if your mother, let’s say, were to bow her knees
in the name of Jesus [Jehovah-Saviour] Christ
and confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, will she be saved?

I am pretty sure all one hundred would say,
"YES, OF COURSE!"

Next ask the same one hundred
whether all those in heaven and earth...

who will also bow and confess
Jesus as Lord will be saved,

and I am pretty sure all one hundred would say,

"NO, OF COURSE NOT!"

See the difference?

Me neither!!

http://whom-seek-ye.ning.com/profile/WilliamWilbur