APOTSLE RONALD D. HOWELL
APOSTLE RONALD D HOWELL SIR, of LIFE CHANGERS INTERNATIONAL NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES IN KAISERSLAUTERN, GERMANY IS ON THE RUN!!!!
Apostle Howell MADE CHASE GOODEN delete his page because Howell is in trouble. Howell the man who said that he never ran from anything is now on the run. COWARD!
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Howell(REPENT) on
-
Amen...former deceited....he is blinded nevertheless but I hope it's not the fact that he is involved himself. At the end of the day, I don't put anything pass Howell for Jezebel did get others to do her dirty work. He will leave Germany spotless while someone else holds the bag.
-
Permalink Reply by The Storm on
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
-
-
Noble, I am trying to see your point but I believe we all are using an alias which I believe is for good reason. I know Wanzo has suggested you to be someone mentioned in an earlier post but this this hasn't been confirmed or denied by you - this make you the coward you are calling us – let’s focus on the issue at hand – Howell the abuser of God’s sheep. Howell is frustrated at the fact that he can't control this situation as it pertains to the real names behind the aliases. It’s not the sheep he has slaughtered and is slaughtering he is concerned with but being in control. This is not normal for a Shepherd who has God’s heart – it’s perverted. This is a serious problem for many have left that ministry so bruised that they wanted nothing to do with God. I know that it isn’t the Pastor’s fault if someone backslides because they rather enjoy sin for season, however, if his abuse is the reason it has happened – he is wrong and a disgrace to the clergy for he should protect them from the lion and the bear!!!!!!!. The concern should not be if we are “ALL” cowards (including yourself) but how do we prevent God's people from being further abused. I am here only for that cause and that cause only. I will reveal myself when the time comes “believe me” it will happen. If Howell was to repent and get things right with God and the 100 plus ex members that have oughts against him, from what I hear, I would disappear never to return; however we know that will not happen. From what I can see, he is in reprobate condition and has danced with the devil too long to turn back to that holy commandment. All things are possible with God and I my prayer is he genuinely gets things right with God for he is a brother who Christ has died for and God’s grace awaits him like anyone else. My recommendation to Wanzo and everyone is to remain anonymous for if you don’t, Howell will spread poison about you to discredit the truth that is being revealed about him on this forum– that’s the way that spirit operates. I don’t have an issue revealing myself for I see the coward Howell is, but I refuse to feed in to that manipulative spirit –if one person avoids this abuse than everything in this forum will not be in vain. I can’t speak for no one but me, and my concern is to stand on the wall and sound the alarm when the enemy is coming – Howell is his condition, is open to the enemy and a warning must be given to those who are unaware that he’s coming. It’s not personnel but ministry.
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
-
-
Ronald D. Howell Sr., a "mountain?" I think not. That's the funniest thing you said yet...ROTFLMBO at Noble Son. You must have forgotten that we are no longer under the control of Mr. Howell and if we want to post on the internet with a screen name we can ...after all that's why you're on here as Noble Son right? You haven't been allowed to get on the internet in years so you don't know the rules of blogs and forums...we understand. Mr. Howell is so mad that he can't control this forum so he has Noble Son trying to manipulate people into revealing who they are....Ronald's your prophet right? Then he should know who we are.
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
-
-
We forgot to mention that YOU - APOSTLE HOWELL was given two invitations to meet with us - since you want to know who we are. We gave you TWO INVITATIONS AND YOU NEVER SHOWED UP! YOU DA COWARD!
God used everyone that left LCI to deliever a message to Apostle Howell, but he denied, denied, denied and he lied, lied and LIED SOME MORE! Apostle Howell - you sure are full of crap. When you come home this evening after reading all our posts, have one of your preachin mistresses give you an enema. You sure need cleaning out.
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
-
Permalink Reply by Noble Son on
-
How would you know whether or not Apostle Howell has repented of anything or not? Does God talk to you about who repents to Him? The bible says we all fall short of the Glory of God. It says there is none good no not one. The bible says let God be true and every man a lie. You come on here as if Apostle is the enemy, and attack his leaders. That is wrong no matter how you slice it. You Howell(repent) may or may not be somebody involved in the ministry but by you condoning what Wanzo is doing you're caught up in his sin. We don't know if Apostle has done the things that are written on here. Even our own legal system says that every man is innocent until "Proven" guilty. Yet you agree with Wanzo coming on here with his accusations. But Wanzo's accusations are heresay, he speaks of Apostle with one of our ministers but there is no proof of that, but Wanzo is hell bent on breaking that family up. Everybody that backs him up are in danger of siding with a devil. Wanzo has yet to show himself a christian. Wanzo has just admitted to being many people. Who does that sound like? Legion... Come on people you are quick to attack a man that hasn't had anything come out that says that he is guilty, period. I don't care how many people come on here saying he's done what, if there's no proof other than hearsay then I don't believe it. And if it is true and He's already repented to God then I don't give a damn what you say, his hands are clean of the blood of all men. You guys have not Idea how God's forgiveness works. I'm on here because it is my job to be on here. I'm the voice of reason to the people who come on here and see nothing but accusers. God is merciful, God is forgiving. None of you have yet to show that. Some of the people if not all of the one's that write under Wanzo's alias were leaders. Not leaders that were so righteous that as soon as they saw something wrong they left. But leaders who left because they did something against the very standards that they gave their word they would follow. Nobody forced them to be leaders. They're leaders that did things like leave the church to be with a man that they weren't married to because he left because he couldn't get his way. Leaders that left because they were following other leaders that left. Not because they were done wrong but because they were mad at what was said about somebody that they like that went against what they swore they would submit to. If you commit to God and to be an Elder or Minister or Deacon in the church then you should know what you're getting into. Now here they are bad mouthing a man because they couldn't get their way. These are supposed to be Christian leaders, some of them didn't have the greatest attitude to begin with. Some of these leaders made saints feel way more uncomfortable then they say Apostle did. Bitter leaders are the worst thing to be following. This church was a spirit led church until it they got mad, then it became a church led by the devil. These are the people you would side with instead of not commenting any way or the other and let God sort things out.
-
-
Noble,
It’s a blessing to see we are pass the Coward thing. I see we come to the conclusion, on why we should remain anonymous - so let’s get to the matter at hand. You stated, “How would I know whether or not Apostle Howell has repented of anything or not? Does God talk to me about who repents to Him? Noble, I owe you an answer to all your questions. First, let me say that after hearing sister Samms encounter and the few I had the chance to read “myself” from the Life after Life Changers group my heart just dropped, for I went into this whole thing unbiased but when the stories from over 100 people matched her story and Wonzo’s accounts, what could I say? You are right I was never really affiliated with the Church; however, I am affiliated with God and know He is hurt by this whole ordeal. So to answer your question about how did I know Howell repented to God – I don’t, but if anyone turns from walking in an ungodly direction to be reconciled with God, why wouldn’t they desire to make things right with the people (over 100 to be exact)they abused who were created in God’s very image. We can’t say we love God who we can’t see and don’t love our brother who we can – we must also make it right with him especially if he has an ought against us and over 100 ex members have just that. Noble, I am assuming you haven’t read those posts to see the bigger picture but if you had we probably wouldn’t be having this conversation – I really want to believe this to be the case. Secondly, God doesn’t talk to me about who repents but Jesus said the fruit will always tell the tale (paraphrased of course) – I have seen un-believers more sorrowful for doing things of less a degree and come and make things right with those they have wronged. Shouldn’t we as Christians be the epitome if such behavior? You stated we all have sinned and fall short of God’s glory and no one’s righteous type deal – I don’t call for Howell to be perfect but to love God’s people and not abuse them. We falling short of God’s Glory due to our condition have nothing to do with deliberately abusing people under our care. There are unbelievers who will continue to fall short of God’s Glory; however, most of them treat the people entrusted to them better than Howell. You said that Howell will have his day in court, but if he would listen court would not have to be an option. There is a possibility that an unbelieving judge will judge a Christian matter that should have never left the Church – you LCI leaders should whole him accountable or take off your minister’s collar. Paul said we will someday judge angels, therefore, we should handle matters such as this without the influence of secular court-room. Howell’s lack of wanting to be accountable (a fruit of pride) makes this impossible; however, if he refuses to listen to his leaders with backbone then you should leave. Again, humility allows a man to listen and realize the error of his way; therefore, he makes things right with those who have an ought with him, they squash it, and they both go on to do bigger and better things. Pride says, it’s not you it’s over 100 other people – after all they did go on vacation instead of taking leave to work in your church for their vacation, they did marry who God said to marry-not who you wanted them to marry, they did put their family before the Church and the kicker is they put God before your church - so they did deserve your abuse. That women definitely deserved to be violated, etc. Therefore, we end up in court where an unbelieving judge tell God’s people how to conduct themselves – this is just ludicrous and I know Paul is turning over in his grave. Like Paul said, God gave the wisdom and discernment to judge such matters and we don’t need to let an unbelieving Judge take the place of the Holy Spirit. I am unaware of the legal issues and believe its disgrace that it has gotten to this point, but I believe what 100 others and Wanzo is saying. You say I am in sin for believing Wanzo and 100 others who were abused, while you believe one twisted individual- come on…..look at what you are saying. Who is more than likely in the sin here? I am attacking you all as leaders because you should know better and are aware of what he has done these sheep and you are Ok with it.
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
© 2024 Created by Raliegh Jones Jr..
Powered by
