APOTSLE RONALD D. HOWELL
APOSTLE RONALD D HOWELL SIR, of LIFE CHANGERS INTERNATIONAL NEW HORIZONS MINISTRIES IN KAISERSLAUTERN, GERMANY IS ON THE RUN!!!!
Apostle Howell MADE CHASE GOODEN delete his page because Howell is in trouble. Howell the man who said that he never ran from anything is now on the run. COWARD!
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Howell(REPENT) on
-
http://abcpreachers.ning.com/forum/topics/apostle-ronald-d-howell
Jorge Howell, you have Lacie Williams at the above link saying all these flattering words of deceit just to get more sheep to murder. What plaques me the most, is the fact that you are not concerned with changing but having an audience full of broken people who will fulfill your selfish desires to get the approval you dingle in front of them like a carrot. I had decided to stay off this network but you come up with some schemes that always draw me back into this discussion. I have come to the conclusion that you are not going to repent but use hair brain schemes to continue your work of darkness. I am more disappointed than anything.
BW, come on….., you lost a good husband behind this selfish man. Life has not gotten better since you meet him – losing the blessing you had (a good man that is hard to find) is not a good testimony – now another woman is reaping the harvest that God had for you. Howell knows this and still drags you along like a used suit case - is that love?. Stop chasing these dreams and chase God. I am truly sorry for what happened in your past, but he is exploiting that weakness instead of pointing you to God who is waiting with opened arms - Howell will leave you dry when you can no longer provide for him.
Saints, I am no expert in these matters but it seems that answering the blog located at the above link will fit Howell’s agenda, thus allowing all the hits to be on his page with his deceptive messages of Howellism. I don’t want to push this cultic message but expose the error in it.
-
Permalink Reply by Jeff Hinnerly on
-
I would suggest that everyone stay focused on this page and let them glad hand each other on their own page. Don't give credence to the conspirators and enablers.
-
Permalink Reply by Noble Son on
-
Correct me if I'm wrong Jeff, but it's my understanding that you've never been to life changers, you just heard about life changers. So what business do you have on here if you've never witnessed anything. You chose a side based off of what people say with no obvious proof. We have yet to see these pictures and these people that you're sticking up for are clearly not Christians based on some nasty hateful things that they say about not only Apostle Howell about also about some of the members and children of the leaders in the church and this is the side you chose to take. I did write a statement saying I was Wanzo Brown I also explained why I did it.
You're getting yourself mixed up in speculation and opinion, not proven fact.
What has any of these people been able to prove to you in order to get you involved in something that you have never witnessed?
Things aren't always what they seem the bible says prove every spirit whether they be of God. Are you able to discern the spirit of this situation according to the word of God? I'm not attacking you, but I have to question your motives in this.
-
-
No he is not!
You are running scared, you are afraid for when LCI is closed down, and you lose your position, that is all you are concerned about. You all are afraid, you, Colm, Jorges, Lacie (especially her), and your spiritual papa Howell are truly afraid.
It was one of you who came on here spouting off about holding your peace, and letting it not be known that you are a fool, and here you are so deseperate that you go and hand us a gift that all of can go on and post comment, that eventually you will take off, or close down the site. Jeff has a good point, and I can divide the time between the two site. I just want to see that sexual predator scum bag taken out of the pulpit and not hurt anyone more women, children and families.
Just like you said Nobel Son, that you have a right to come on this site, Jeff, and anyone else has the right to come on this site and speak their "peace." HA HA!
Isn't there an all you can eat place you have to be at?
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
-
-
Let´s talk about character everyone.
What kind of character would you say of someone that professes to be an apostle, and molest women, blames God for his failed marriage, manipulates and intimidates, tells people not to associate with other churches, and former members, tells people that if they do that they are signing their ticket to hell. That is what RONALD D HOWELL SR did.
What kind of CHARACTER IS THAT?
-
-
Leave it to Jones trying to use pontification to justify Howell's nasty behind, all of them still in denial. For those reading these posts, they know, and YOU KNOW, it is not spectulation. You are still trying to undermine the women coming forward. Just because they are not all on here giving there testimony you are trying to still call all of a liar, and you won't get away with it.
Your phoney leader is putting out false information full of lie, and you are on here trying to say this spectulation. Is the Finance ministry full of spectulation, Is the bank holding the note speculation? I guess all of us women are speculation? Is Howell collecting money for speakers that never show, or collecting money for a parking lot never purchased spectulation? Jones, you are as big of a liar as that low life Ronald D. Howell.
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
-
-
Why do you (rather you all) even care, if all this "attack" on Howell is merely speculation with evil intent? Innocent people don't lend so much credence to mere speculation. This must be the ugly truth concerning Howell, and based on the momentum of "counter attack" by the pro-Howell/pro-deception side, the truth must be making an impact.
-
-
When Noble Son, Jones uses the word "speculation," it is being used for fishing. They are desperate for information.
This is constant wrangling that says: "WHERE'S THE PROOF!"
They want to know what we are reporting, in order to prepare the lie. That was the reason Howell attacked all of these German women. For now, it is the only info he thought he had, and that he could half-way glean through his emmissary, and they did not give Howell the whole story, but it did not stop the reprobate from attacking these innocent women. His emmissaries are now are reported to authorites for trying to illegally obtain information. That was the reason for me warning others, as it was reported.
Howell and his devil squad are looking more guilty by the day. We know the man is desperate (the rat), he would attack others if he could find out the names of those who are coming forward.
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
-
-
focus on Jesus Christ.
Apostle Ronald D Howell Sr. is a vicitm of cyberstalking there are posts on this discussion as well as others that is proof of this, below is the definition of cyber stalking, it is apparent that these people will go to great lengths to stalk and defame the character of Apostle Howell. You decide for yourself if this is what is going on before believing what they say...
Cyberstalking is the use of the Internet or other electronic means to stalk or harass an individual, a group of individuals, or an organization. It may include false accusations, monitoring, making threats, identity theft, damage to data or equipment, the solicitation of minors for sex, or gathering information in order to harass. The definition of "harassment" must meet the criterion that a reasonable person, in possession of the same information, would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.[1] Cyberstalking is different from spatial or offline stalking. However, it sometimes leads to it, or is accompanied by it.[2]- Which would mean they would sit outside the house of the person and note who's at their house
A number of key factors have been identified:
- False accusations. Many cyberstalkers try to damage the reputation of their victim and turn other people against them. They post false information about them on websites. They may set up their own websites, blogs or user pages for this purpose. They post allegations about the victim to newsgroups, chat rooms or other sites that allow public contributions, such as Wikipedia or Amazon.com.[5]
- Attempts to gather information about the victim. Cyberstalkers may approach their victim's friends, family and work colleagues to obtain personal information. They may advertise for information on the Internet, or hire a private detective. They often will monitor the victim's online activities and attempt to trace their IP address in an effort to gather more information about their victims. [6]
- Encouraging others to harass the victim. Many cyberstalkers try to involve third parties in the harassment. They may claim the victim has harmed the stalker or his/her family in some way, or may post the victim's name and telephone number in order to encourage others to join the pursuit.
- False victimization. The cyberstalker will claim that the victim is harassing him/her. Bocij writes that this phenomenon has been noted in a number of well-known cases
Profile
Preliminary work by Leroy McFarlane and Paul Bocij has identified four types of cyberstalkers: the vindictive cyberstalkers noted for the ferocity of their attacks; the composed cyberstalker whose motive is to annoy; the intimate cyberstalker who attempts to form a relationship with the victim but turns on them if rebuffed; and collective cyberstalkers, groups with motive.[14] According to Antonio Chacón Medina, author of Una nueva cara de Internet, El acoso ("A new face of the Internet: stalking"), the general profile of the harasser is cold, with little or no respect for others. The stalker is a predator who can wait patiently until vulnerable victims appear, such as women or children, or may enjoy pursuing a particular person, whether personally familiar to them or unknown. The harasser enjoys and demonstrates their power to pursue and psychologically damage the victim.[15]
The most common behavior is to post defamatory or derogatory statements about their stalking target on web pages, message boards and in guest books designed to get a reaction or response from their victim, thereby initiating contact.[17] In some cases, they have been known to create fake blogs in the name of the victim containing defamatory content
© 2024 Created by Raliegh Jones Jr..
Powered by
