There are a number of people (believing themselves to be of higher elevation) biting at the bit to heap coals of fire upon the female regarding her spiritual creation and subsequent exercise of right authority in God according to call. However, they seem to be the same individuals when rightly confronted with higher revelation pertaining to the garden word that simply scatter.
Where are the answers to Genesis 2:23 regarding the unauthorized and illegal actions taken by an already dark Adam? Explain the presence of a silent, deceiving Adam during the fall of the female, please. Explain why a God of Foreknowledge that is pleased by works of righteousness in the earth, yet called the man “Adam” (meaning a hypocrite, man of low-degree and to be made ashamed) and the female, “Eve” (meaning “life-giver”) in a fallen garden giving birth to death.
Explain to me why the confession of Eve in Genesis 3:13 is of no effect, and if of no effect why God would also compel a now punished Adam to call her the “mother of all living” in Genesis 3:20 and not respectively also himself, “the father of all living,” as a fallen yet un-confessed garden man who you say was of a higher elevation. Please consider, Adam alone fathered every child belonging to Eve, why was he not also designated by God in like manner? Explain to me given what you say was a deceiving and lying female, how it is that even God was made to be the fool in compelling such a thing?
Explain to me also the relevance of a bone in the creation of the female given that it was the desire and will of God to use flesh only from Adam, yet as recorded in Genesis 2:21 he “closed up the flesh instead thereof.” Explain to me why the flesh of Adam was rejected even by God? What in fact, was really going on and what does it really say about this dusty man Adam? And by the way, what grows in the dust anyway?
Explain to me also, given the reality of this word, why it is repeatedly taught that the female “came out of” the “side” of the man? Yes, the side was opened but the flesh of that side was rejected by God. Even the Hebrew points primarily to the use of the “rib” alone, yet how do you excuse that even word refers to the use of the rib alone twice (Genesis 2:21 and 2:22) however it is only a dark and rebellious Adam that assumed the use of his now bleeding flesh as well. Why teach such a thing?
Explain also why God spoke future victory over the enemy to a confessed Eve only in Genesis 3:15 if Adam were indeed her spiritual head. But was God now speaking out of order, and why did this same God acknowledge even the spiritual head of the female in so doing? Please explain these things to me, thou who art of such a higher elevation.
Why do things such as this even matter? It matters, because one it is both the inspired and recorded word of God. And two, because such teachings are spoken into the lives particularly of trusting females from a position of authority in word producing chaos and havoc, and in the very least, whether aware or unaware, binding them in spiritual blindness according to the dark mind of Adam. It is as binding upon the female as it serves to feed the flesh and weaken the male. But there should be something separating us from the other major religion in the world pertaining to what we know has to be a reflection of a higher will, design and plan of God. Yet as I read someone say, perhaps Christian women should begin covering themselves from head to toe as well. But is that who you really are? Should we be circumcised too? Really?
Be very careful, God is doing a new thing in the earth. He is now working to fully deliver the accuracy of His word even to the church first. God saw fit to cut the flesh of a rebellious Adam to the bone, how will he in fact find you?
I look forward to receiving your responses according to interpretation of the biblical text only and not mere tradition.