The Bible teaches that, "Truth crushed to the ground is rising again!" (Ps. 85:11 PP). A part of that truth that is springing forth from the earth is the truth about God and women. Scripture tells us that the 'the letter killeth, the spirit giveth life' (2 Cor. 3:6). A lot of things are written in Scripture that seemingly forbid women participation in the church. However, research has found that Paul's words were taken out of context and in fact, had more to do with protocol going on in the newly established churches of that time.

In the meantime, God's wisdom has taught me many things with regard to His will for women. The first thing taught is that God's will was always for 'men and women' to speak and Glorify His name everywhere, including in the church. Let us remember the original word from God concerning 'Adam/man' and 'Adam/woman' (Note:Scripture tells us that God originally referred to the man and woman as 'Adam' (Gen. 5:2) Adam then called the 'woman,' 'woman' and God honored that (Gen. 2:23-24). It was only after the fall that the 'woman' was named 'Eve' (Gen. 3:20). Talk about the '3 faces of Eve,' eh?

At any rate, the original will of God was 'equality' for man and woman. Scripture tells us that 'God put His Spirit in both WOMEN and men' (Mal. 2:15). As so, if the spirit of the Living God abides in women just as it does in men then it is impossible that God would mean, 'women can't speak or preach in church' for how else can one express the power, might, glory of God but by speaking it?

Where else can we glorify God amongst our own but in the church? Besides, Scripture says, 'the body is the temple of the Lord' and therefore we must glorify God in our 'Temple/body.' How much more shall we glorify God amidst a united temple of believers who dwell in church buildings? (1 Cor. 3:16). It is wrong to teach otherwise. The original command was 'God blessed, 'THEM', not just HIM but HER as well and stated, 'have dominion (subdue with kindness) the Earth and all that is therein" (Gen. 1:26-28). That's 'dominion' over the Earth and NOT each other.

Now, that said, the function of men and women is quite different. Masculinity does act as a figure head, that Femininity just naturally yields to within a marriage setting. I cannot tell you how many women want to feel protected with a strong, intelligent, righteous man. Unfortunately, with men so screwed up today, they are going to stay in 'want.'

At any rate, this function is proper in a marriage setting alone. Amidst that setting, the woman enjoys playing the nurturer, co-counselor in all 'decision' making aspects for Scripture says, 'it was not good for man to be alone' (Gen. 2:18). What that means is, not only physically alone, but as well alone, in making decisions. Hence, God would emphasize the importance of the woman's role when God brought His creation 'woman' to man. He more or less told Adam, 'now listen, you've been enjoying naming animals and the such, but now, this wonderful creation 'woman' is not for you to 'take authority over' in the sense that you have had the joy of naming animals I brought to you. She is now co-namer of all things with you. She is your equal and you must listen and heed her wisdom as that which is as great and important to your survival than your own thinking. In fact, she is your survival, your 'helper!' You cannot mentally, spiritually, etc, function right without her wise input!' (Gen. 2:24).

God seemed to instinctively know that He would have to strongly get that point across to the man as if he didn't, trouble would surely, erupt. Through the subsequent actions with regard to the 'fall', we see God was right to emphasize the importance of equality. That is, the first thing Adam did after the fall was 'blame' 'God and the woman.' He stated, 'it was that WOMAN that YOU gave me who is responsible for this' (Gen. 3:12).
That un-repentant mindset of Adam was passed down to men and to this day, men 'blame and fault' women for the wrongs of the world. Women in Scripture have always been portrayed from a negative perspective. In fact, women have been lied upon and blasphemed (Rev. 13:6).

For instance, Mary Magdalene has always been portrayed as a 'prostitute' when research now tells us that she was not. The same thing with 'Rahab'. Research now finds out that her alleged 'prostitution' was in reality, idol worship. Yeah sure, that Philistine woman, Delilah seduced Samson but he was just as guilty for going after that worldly type of woman in the first place. However, preachers curse her more than Samson's stupid, downright ridiculously flaunted 'worldly' behavior amidst being spirit-filled. (Jud. 13-16).

At any rate, back to the 'fall' and the different mentality that was about the man versus the woman. The woman fessed up to her wrongs. She admitted that she willfully listened to the deceiving serpent (Gen. 3:13). In so doing, she left no un-repentant ground for Satan to use. This is why righteous women throughout Scripture have always been the first to know of, and proclaim the might of God. Just look at the case of Samson's mother. The angel came to her, and she preached the truth to her husband, who doubted and was later visited by the angel (Judg. 13:2-25).

God's spirit was in Deborah and she was 'Judge' of all Israel (Judgs. 4). This truth alone, proves that God could not have meant that 'women shouldn't preach' as this woman not only preached, but led the whole nation.
Remember, Scripture says, 'God is the same today, yesterday and forever' (Heb. 13:8). Meaning, He did not mean for only these women of Old Testament Biblical history to lead and preach. Just look at the greatest miracle in American history, the woman Harriet Tubman. She bore witness that God raised 'HER' up. 19 times she went into the south and freed groups of God's enslaved people and 19 times, she successfully came out with men, women and children. No man, equalled what this valiant woman of God did. See then, God through his 'actions' is teaching us that 'He uses whom He will and His will is for women to preach, teach, prophesy and do exploits.' (Dn. 11:32).

Also, because of the King Barack's 'doubt and fear' during the reign of Deborah, the spirit of the Lord used the might and strength of the woman Jael to shame the 'man's' weakness and fear. Yes, Jael is the 'woman' song and praised throughout the ages for bringing down the enemy King Sisera (4:17-24). Can we hear a "Michele's in the white house representing?" :-)

Again, God's spirit is in both men and WOMEN and niether were meant to be constrained via demented males purposely misinterpreting the role of women. Male's misinterpretation stifled and destroyed many a good woman. Also, let us remember that God's testimony is, 'I hate divorce (Mal. 2:15). Yet, out of love and concern for women God allowed divorce in order to stop men from destroying women (Mal. 2:15).


In other words, 'divorce' was a gifted weapon from God to women. Fallen male's treatment of women can destroy the woman's role and function and so wreak havoc on planet earth. This happened in the past and it is happening today. In fact, it is prophesied that the anti-Christ will have no 'desire for women' (Dn. 11:37).

It is the spirit of Satan working through the hardhearted, un-repented mindset of fallen males. That 'Adam-ic' 'blame God and women' mentality is seen in males mistreatment of women worldwide. See, when Adam did not take responsibility for what he did, that part of his mindset became 'corrupted fertile ground.' As a result, Satan has had a field day using males to destroy God's precious creation, woman.

Just look at the so-called religion of Islam. The woman is oppressed and sorely afflicted. In Africa, the woman is chattel. The same with Asian nations. The male's warped, twisted mindset with regard to women keeps women and those nations steeped in darkness, chaos, destruction and death. This is the state of mind Adam unleashed for Satan to abuse when he did not repent of his evil participation in the fall and instead, 'blamed God and the woman' (Gen. 3:12).

Yet, we saw God's remedy towards Adam's action of standing there allowing the woman to be deceived (Gen. 3:1-8). God stepped in as husband to the woman and stood the ground that Adam should have stood by immediately expelling the serpent. At any rate, the serpent thought God's wrath would be upon the woman. However, instead, God stood up for the woman and informed the serpent that He too, would use the same trusting nature of the woman to bring down Satan's evil that he had just pulled off. In other words, God is proclaiming, "He still loves and cherishes the magnificent 'woman' He created."

However, let me say this, God did warn the woman of one of the consequences of her disobedience, he stated with regard to her husband Adam, 'your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall have rule over you' (Gen. 3:16). Male preachers have erroneously taught that that means God was giving the man 'rule over the woman.' However, reality is, God was warning the woman that the once 'equality' relationship she had with her husband in the garden was now 'destroyed'. The man would take 'illegal' rule over the woman. She would think or desire to be like it once was, but it was no more.

At any rate, God would use a woman to bring forth the redeemer to get back what Adam had just given away (Gen. 3:15). God would also 'put enmity' between Satan and the woman. Meaning, though Satan now had fertile ground to use the man's un-repentant state, the righteous women throughout the ages would be the key vessels used by the Most High to destroy the works of the devil.

Hence, we are told of mighty women used by God. There was Miriam the prophetess and leader of Israel right along with her brother Aaron and Moses. (Ex. 15:20; Mic. 6:4; etc.). Ruth and Naomi would come forth obediently setting the stage for the birth of King David who would be a type of Christ (Ruth 4:13-22). Esther would come forth and be the vessel God would use to stop a satanic genocide (Est.). Rahab a gentile African woman would be used to destroy idolatrous Canaanite factions (Josh. 2). Etc.

On and on the list would go of women being used mightily by God. As well, prophecy says in the last days, 'God would pour out His spirit on our sons and DAUGHTERS' (Joel 2:28-29). God said, the 'daughters' i.e. females i.e women would prophesy.' Well how can women prophesy i.e speak the profound truths of God if they are not allowed to 'speak or preach' in the church? Besides, in the New Testament this prophecy was fulfilled as Scripture makes mention of the 4 DAUGHTERS of Phillip 'prophesying' (Acts 21:9; 2:17). Again, the 'letter' i.e. 'written word' killeth but the Spirit through it 'actions' towards women gives life and truth with regard to God's will for women.

As so, on Pentacost, the Holy Spirit sure didn't believe women couldn't preach as the Holy Spirit came upon men and WOMEN and both were heard to be speaking the wisdom of God (Acts 2:17).

Not only that, prior to pentacost it was 'women' who were the first to know of, and speak the might and praises of God with regard to the Messiah's entrance on planet earth. Whereas, disobedient man was unaware of what was going on with regard to prophecy. Just read Luke's account of Elizabeth and Mary whose Hebrew name is Miriam. (Luke 1:39-56;) The fact is, the man Zachariah was stricken deaf and dumb for his 'unbelief' but not so, with the women. They with a loud voice, proclaimed, preached, annouced, and praised God before all of heaven for the miracle messiah that was now on Earth residing in the womb of young Mary/Miriam (Lk. 1:18-25).

Also, know this, it was women alone, who were the FIRST to know of the resurrected Christ (Matt. 28:1-11). It was none other than angels of the Most High, and Jesus himself, who commanded 'WOMEN' in the form of Mary Magdalene and the other 'women' to PREACH the first resurrection message (Mk. 16:1-8). The fact is, the might and righteousness of women gave them the strength to go to the tomb with intent to fulfill the Hebrew burial laws of God come what may, soldiers or no soldiers.

Whereas, the men were all cowardly hidden away. However, the women's fearless strength caused them to be the FIRST to PREACH of the resurrection. How then can preacher's erroneously preach that 'women must be silent, can't speak or preach?' The fact is, Paul must, have meant something else as he himself, often commended women preachers.

There was priscilla who was called an apostle right along with her husband (Acts 18:2, 18.26; Rom. 16:3). Phoebe was called a 'servant' but the Greek word for 'servant' was 'minister or preacher' (Rom. 1:16). Oh, and what happened to the many women on Pentacost who were baptized in the Holy Spirit? (Acts 2:17). Do you think they just kept silent after that day? No! It would have been a sin if they had. Instead, they too, went forth 'preaching and teaching.' We know that there were active spiritual groups run by women as Paul came upon the woman Lydia (Acts 16:14). Of a surety, she and the women with her were baptized in the Holy Spirit (Acts. 16:14-15).

In all these matters, please know of a certainty, that the 'letter' of the word taught erroneously has been a violation of God's will with regard to women. Women, like men, were ordained by Jesus/Yahshua Himself, to "go into all the world and PREACH' the gospel' (Mk. 16:15-18).

Bottom line, as all are baptized in the Holy Spirit, then 'all,' meaning both men and 'women,' should preach the word of God to a lost and dying world. We should not forsake the assemblying of ourselves together. We must come together as righteous men and WOMEN to preach, teach, prophesy within the church (Heb. 10:25).. It is the will of God. As such,, who can withstand it and prevail?!

Views: 578

Replies are closed for this discussion.

Replies to This Discussion

Brother YahsNlvllm,,

What you are writing is based upon tradition and not supported in the garden word. God rejected the flesh of Adam in the creation of Eve, woman did not "come out" of man, God cut the now bleeding flesh of Adam, rejected that flesh and used his "bone" only instead. A bone which ultimately wasn't even relevant in the females creation as it was the desire of God to use the flesh of the man, hence Genesis 2:24. God elected to reject the flesh of a man whom according even to the Foreknowledge of God would choose a garden path of disobedience and would demonstrate disdain only for rightly making the garden confession of truth. Adam sought to change his name in 2:23 as well as the name of the female, yet it was God in 3:9 who still called the man "Adam" and not "Man" and proved his will for the female in 3:20 by compelling a now very punished Adam to call her "Eve" and not rebelliously, selfishly, and deceitfully "Woman" instead. Also, a silent Adam who was present in 3:1-6 said absolutely nothing to correct the idea the female had about the fruit (an idea coming from where but from Adam) that it could be neither touched or eaten. Please explain this perfect man theory, and why God (even according to His foreknowledge) would elevate the dark state of such. Given the true realities of the garden, if God did indeed elevate the man, then based upon sound God doctrine, God at that very time ceases to be God.

Please no tradition, give detailed discernment of word, perhaps starting with the issues of "Adam," oh no, I mean "Man" in 2:23. Can you explain also why the female alone was honored by God in name and title ("Eve" = "life-giver", title/reward as "mother of all living") and an Adam who you say was elevated by God was not? Do you know more than God does?

Your doctrine with all due respect is not based upon the truth of word and therefore does not give God (Yahweh) the glory and is the ruining of female lives and to the weakening of men.

Peace and love,

Dawn
Nice post there Bro....
YahsNiviim,

I am right now praying for God to open your eyes and to forgive you.
Dawn's not in error, nor am I, or any other believer in Yahshua, rather YOU are. Oh, and by the way, everyone needs prayer.

I, too, forgive you and am praying that YHWH opens your eyes to the truth. We are not a Jezebel spirit. A Jezebel spirit is a spirit that is anti-Christ. We are PRO CHRIST. In all our doings, Christ is lifted up and as Yahshua proclaims, "I, if I be lifted up, will draw all men to me." Please go to Yahshua and pray to be enlightened.

Even though you are a stickler for the 'letter of the law,' we are not against you, but you are against us and that is wrong, for as you see, amidst all this discussion Christ is 'lifted up.' I reitierate, a Jezebel spirit does not lift up our Lord and Savior.

Now granted, there is a worldly spirit of Jezebel in 'worldly' females who reject Christ. However, as you can see from we wonderful, God-Revering women and men our words lift up YHWH and God's precious women.

In fact, I believe God raised us up and revealed truth to us in order to counter the false Jezebel spirit out there so innocent women, and girls won't get sucked into that trap. As such is the case, if God be for us, and He is, who can be against us and prevail?

Let's pray one for another as Scripture commands. The helpmeet has spoken. So let it be written, so let it be done! :-)
Can't be lifting through lies and fables
AliYah Yisrael~Servant of Yah,

This is wrong in so many ways, but suffice to say right now, Adam should have physically made her the "mother of all living" in the garden well before the fall. And he would have, according to the very will of God, If he had first bothered to rightly handle his busines as a husband to Eve. But Adam is not rightly identified one time in the garden as a "husband" and yet Eve several times over rightly as a wife. The truth, a rebellious Adam withheld her name because he was threatened by her true greater garden authority, and the only thing separating the two was that she rightly made a garden confession of sin before God yet Adam did not.

Deal with the difference of meaning in their names. The name of "Adam" by God was no compliment and yet "Eve" given only now by an Adam both punished and compelled by God, means "life-giver." You speak as though Adam were just merely strolling through the park, "Oh, I think I'll name the female "Eve," nice name don't ya know." Like the world hadn't just fallen and he wasn't now forced to stand in right answer to God. How much more do you guys just make up? This is ridiculous. You guys are way out of order. You can begin by ceasing to imagine that you are a god. This is idolatry. That a man establishes/established the purpose of the female? Why do I even need God as long as I have one of you, right? What else can you do for me? Well how about submitting to truth and then teaching that for a change. Good grief fellas.

Dawn
Hi Yah, listen I started this post. I am a born-again, spirit-filled believer in Yahshua Hamashiach and so is Dawn. As so, I would ask that you be respectful in your replies. This min.. West has been disrespectful, rude, crude and insulting and as a result no one really respects him as his ignorance speaks for itself.

However, you at least are showing you have true insight to the word of God. As you are willing to debate I would ask you to do as Yahshua would do and debate respecting the person of women speaking the truth as the Ruach Hakadosh has taught us.

That said, I look forward to Dawn's response to your reply. She has been respectful to Min. West's vile ramblings how much more would she, as a believer be respectful to your well thought out points?

Now, I'm not going to answer for her but I would like to say this with regard to a couple of points you made. The Bible says, with regard to all God made up until Adam, 'and God saw what he had made and it was good.' Whereas, the word of God says, 'it was NOT good' for the man to be alone. It was only after God made the woman that God proclaimed Adam 'good.'

I bring this up with regard to your point on Adam's relationship with God. Also, remember God admonished Adam after he had brought the woman to him. The Bible says, the man shall leave his mother and father and become ONE with or cleave to, the woman' and only then would the blessing of God be upon the marriage.

Also, I would like you to address God's identification of the woman as a 'help mate.' Adam needed help. It was NOT good for Adam to be alone.

With regard to the woman's conversation with the serpent, where did the woman get the erroneous belief that she could not 'touch or taste the fruit' (Gen. 3:8)? Is that what Adam told her? If so, why would he 'distort' the matter?

We know the woman was not a liar for when God questioned her, she told the truth i.e. the serpent beguiled me and I did eat. Well, did Adam first beguile her with the whole 'don't touch or taste the food' when in reality God said only not to 'eat' the food? If so, again I ask you, 'why'? What was going on in Adam's mind? I think Dawn has well answered that point but I would like to hear your 'respectful' comments as I, and I'm sure Dawn will respect and discourse with you on a mature, intelligent Christian level where Christ always dwells. Thanks, ahead of time.
Shalom YahsNivim, thank you for your reply. Let me first say, that I do understand your sentiment with regard to proper terminology but would remind you that Paul (Shauv) said, 'I become all things to all men that I might win some to Christ.'

Elsewhere the apostle speaks of 'strong meat versus milk' for young believers (1 Cor. 3:2). As such is the case, I well understand the Ruach HaKodesh reaching people on the level where they are at. If they call Yahshua Jesus, then that is acceptable. If they call him Yahshua then that is another level of accepatability for in YHWH's house are many states of existence or 'mansions' as Jesus would say (Jn. 14:2). We go from 'glory to glory' and should praise God that each of us goes at our own pace with the important thing being, we all will get there.

As such is the case, I look forward to discussing the things of YHWH with you.
Good afternoon YahsNivim, I'm glad you are there to teach the truth as you understand it with regard to the significance of YHWH's name. I think it's very important to know the full impact of that aspect of spirituality. If you have written on this in a post let me know where I can find it.
Still, in the meantime, I think we go from glory to glory. A person who is a 'babe' in Christ still needs 'milk' and are not able to receive the 'spiritual meat'. Perhaps, it will take them a long time, years even to get where you are. I don't think Christ will begrudge such a one no more than a mother or father would begrudge their small children for not being able to properly articulate words and meanings.
However, among the spiritual grown yes, the true spiritual power of Yahshua should always be spoken.
Elaine/and Dawn I haven't been as you say vile in my ramblings/your assumption about my wife mother and sisters is what is vile i said what I said yet you continue with your erroneus feministic lesbian taught views about a subject that as it has beenm shown you are in error.......

And by the way Elaine where is your covering....................?

Just as others on this sight and other sites you can't answer the questions or don't like the way the TRUTH is presented so you say oh they don't know I will talk to you and not him/sinply infantile at best........

the Woman must have made the Statement on her own/ohno that's not possible to you is it....
the way you post is like a Child who has gotten in trouble and wants to continue to ask why/why/why?????? Point blank you can not prove what youy are saying through scripture/neither can any other who is in error............

Where in scripture do you find that Adam told her not to touch or taste anything?????????
canone of youy answer that.............

The truth of the whole matter is this..... Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden.........the Serpent was cursed to the ground..........sin entered the wold through Adam.........Eve was not sinless in the matter/beguiled led her to sin...........

Funny how Dawn says alot about what she feels yet she didn't answer when called scholar...
must not be one huh.................
YahsNiviim,

It is late, I will get back to you hopefully tomorrow but you are really distorting word. And just to clear one thing up, I never said that the female should be exalted over the male, neither the female or the male should rightly ever be exalted one over the other. If you have been reading my writings by now you should be able to at least get that much about me right. Also, in the garden saga, the man "Adam" is absolutely NEVER rightly defined as anything other than as an "Adam" which is a name, yes identical in meaning with one Hebrew meaning of the word "man" (as there are two within the garden story) and is fully defined as: "ruddy", i.e. a human being (an individual or the species, mankind, etc.):-x another, + hypocrite, + common sort, x low, man (mean, of low degree), person.

Further the name "Adam" is based upon another Hebrew word meaning to "show blood (in the face), i.e., flush or turn rosy:-, be dyed, made) red, ruddy.

So yes, the "man" was very "ruddy" as a fallen yet un-confessed man now made before God to be both ashamed and humiliated by not proving ability to rightly handle the things of God. No matter what happened in the garden Adam was responsible, just as was Eve, to make the garden confession, she did, he did not. He was therefore "red," ashamed and humiliated before God by way of the punishment he thus received from God for withholding a full garden confession of truth.

Perhaps you need to learn the word before you speak. God's desire in marriage for the male and the female were for the two to be of one flesh as evidenced in Genesis 2:24. Yet in the case of an Adam God elected NOT to use the "flesh" of Adam and used bone only instead. A bone, given the actual will of God for two to be of one flesh, which was ultimately completely irrelevent in the creation of the female. Even God was purposing to tell us this in these verses. What then was God's point in using the bone given what we also have in 2:24? And I don't want to hear anything about "bone" properties, try speaking the word this time.

And it wouldn't hurt you to come down off of your "high" perch, O'Holy One from I-s-r-a-e-l. Am I supposed to bow too? Really? These were the same exact problems of an arrogant and proud Adam. This is much of what he looked like. Well, that's what I hate, the pride and the arrogance. You could at least be right. Take a look in the mirror and give Adam a wink because that is who will be looking back at you.

And this: Now I will not deny the fact that Adam Failed in his part to cover his ishshah. He really did. So it's ok with you, and you suspect also God, that Adam willingly served as an accomplice in the fall of Eve and what Adam surely thought would be her death? That's just an aside to you. You feel perfectly fine just brushing it off. No big deal. You are surely in bondage.

Get my book, "The Real Skinny on Eve" brother, you really need to be free.

Peace and love.

Dawn.
We Ordain Women Because We Baptize Girls
Galatians 3:27-29
By Chuck Poole, Lifeshare Community Ministries


“Something there is that does not love a wall, that wants it down,” wrote Robert Frost, leaving us to wonder exactly what that something is that so opposes a wall. For one possible answer, we might see Paul; specifically, what Paul said to the Galatians in chapter three, verses 27-29. In Galatians 3:27-29, Paul tells us something that does not love a wall. In Paul’s mouth, the something that wants walls down is water. Not just any water, though. Paul is talking about the swift, strong, deep, division-drowning water of baptism. Indeed, rarely has anyone thrown such cold water on such old walls as Paul did when he wrote, “As many of you as were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.”

One imagines that Paul’s words about baptism made quite a splash in Galatia. The idea that the walls of race, class and gender are washed away in the water of baptism ran counter to the conventional wisdom of Paul’s world, conventional wisdom that is captured in a popular “men-only” prayer which went like this: “Blessed art thou, O Lord our God, who hast not made me a Gentile. Blessed art thou, O Lord Our God, who hast not made me a slave. Blessed art thou, O Lord our God, who hast not made me a woman.” What Paul told the Galatians was that, in the water of baptism, those divisions are swept away.¹ “As many of you as were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ. There is no longer Jew or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male or female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus.” Paul told the church at Galatia that they could not embrace the water of baptism while also holding onto the walls of division. Their neat, settled, familiar categories of race, class and gender had been washed away in the water of baptism.

If that’s what Galatians 3:27-29 meant for them then, what does it mean for us, now? I believe it means here what it meant there: In the water of baptism, our culture’s walls of division are washed away. Race, class, and gender remain as human realities, but for those who have been baptized they can no longer be relevant to who’s in or who’s out, who leads by serving or who serves by leading. Men are still male and women are still female, but in the baptized family of faith, in the church of Jesus Christ, it just doesn’t matter. That’s what Galatians 3:27-29 means.

So why have some baptized Christians so steadfastly maintained their denial of certain roles in the church to people based on nothing more than the fact they happened to have been born female? I think they would say, “Because of what the Bible says.” After all, in I Corinthians 14:34-35, the Bible says, “Women should keep silent in the church. They are not permitted to speak, but should be subordinate. If there is anything they want to know they should ask their husbands at home. It is shameful for a woman to speak in church.” And then there is I Timothy 2:11 and 12, which says, “Let a woman learn in silence, in full submission. I permit no woman to teach a man.” So, there you go. That’s what the Bible says. End of story. Right? Well, not exactly! The same Bible that gives us I Corinthians 14:34-35 and I Timothy 2:11-12, also gives us Acts 2:17-18, which says, “Thus says the Lord, I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy.” Here, God specifically includes daughters and sisters as preachers and proclaimers. Then, of course, there is I Corinthians 11:5, “Any woman who prays or prophesies with her head unveiled disgraces her head.” Obviously, Paul is expecting women to help lead worship, otherwise why would he establish a dress-code for women worship leaders?

Let’s be honest. Here, as in other cases, the Bible speaks with more than one voice. (That’s why we must always interpret any single passage of scripture in conversation with, not in isolation from, the rest of the Bible.) When it comes to the roles of women in the church, the Bible is in a tie. (With itself!)

“But what about the gospels? Didn’t Jesus pick only men for the twelve apostles?” Yes, but weren’t the first voices to proclaim the most important message ever told all women and only women, on the morning of the resurrection? And what about Luke 8:3, which lists the many women who went about with Jesus and the apostles? (And, on a much deeper level, those who would exclude women from ministry on the basis of the Bible probably don’t want to call too much attention to the four gospels. After all, the gospels say that we must give to everyone who begs from us (Matthew 5:42), we must not resist evildoers (Matthew 5:39), we must not own more than one coat as long as anyone has no coat (Luke 3:11), we must make loans without seeking repayment (Luke 6:35), and we must sell our possessions and give the proceeds to the poor if we want to follow Jesus. (Luke 14:33). I know many people who deny women a place in ministry on the grounds that they “believe the Bible,” but who dismiss, with a wink and a nod, the most radical sayings of Jesus, which leaves one to wonder how a person can use two or three verses of scripture to exclude someone from serving God, while simultaneously ignoring many verses of scripture just because they don’t fit the conventional wisdom of North American culture.)

Let’s just be honest about all this. The Bible does not speak with ones seamless, homogenized, unanimous voice on the question of the roles of women in the church. If all we have to go on are the words on the page, then the Bible is pretty much in a tie. (With itself!)

So, what breaks the tie? For me, the tie is broken by the boundary-shattering, wall-removing, fence-climbing, gate-opening Spirit of Christ. But if the Spirit of Jesus is too subjective, if we must limit ourselves to that which is written in black-and-white on the pages of scripture, I would say that the tiebreaker is Galatians 3:27-29, which tells us that we cannot embrace our baptism while also maintaining distinctions in the church between male and female.


http://www.centerforbaptiststudies.org/sermons/poole01.htm

RSS

© 2024   Created by Raliegh Jones Jr..   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service