Commandment of food laws. Should we eat all things, or should we eat only what Yah commands?

[James Pierce]

Anyone?

[Archbishop Trevor 'Elihu' Greene]

Before I step out on faith for this one, I have to hear your answer to my question. It sets the stage for all the arguments that will come your way:

Do you regard the words of the Apostles as the Word of the LORD?

[James Pierce]

Trevor,

Let us start with the words of Yah, then we will deal with the Apostles. Thats only fair. Throughout scripture, we are to heed the voice of YAHUAH, then if Prophets, Apostles, and Ministers words line up with the voice of YAHUAH, then they are legite. If they do not, then we are not to heed them. So, let us start with the words of YAHUAH, then we shall move on to the Apostles.

[Archbishop Trevor 'Elihu' Greene]

Lets try this again:

Do you regard the words of the Apostles as the Word of the LORD? According to "Kingdom order", Moses the Prophet wrote down the words that GOD gave to him. Even though he was the second greatest Prophet of his time (John the Baptist being greater), the Apostle outranks the Prophet. Therefore, the revelation of the Apostles brings order to the prophetic words of the Prophets.

Now, back to the statement: Do you regard the words of the Apostles as the Word of the LORD? A Simple yes or no would suffice.......

[James Pierce]

Trevor,

Yes. ONLY if they are inline with Yah.

[Archbishop Trevor 'Elihu' Greene]

(What Apostle's epistle within the Bible wasn't in line with YAH???)

[James Pierce]

Trevor,

Let us not argue, but reason. Go ahead and begin your debate.

[Archbishop Trevor 'Elihu' Greene]

1) I'm not debating a thing. I will state the scriptures, and leave it at that.

2) My question was actually a real question. What Apostle's epistle was against the will of GOD the FATHER?

[James Pierce]

Trevor,

Start your debate. Dont just state and leave. We will reason.

[Archbishop Trevor 'Elihu' Greene]

There is little point debating a person who will not accept any correction.

[Archbishop Trevor 'Elihu' Greene]

I'll post all of them separately so that they can get a fair response:

Genesis 9:1-4

"And God blessed Noah and his sons, and said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth. And the fear of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast of the earth, and upon every fowl of the air, upon all that moveth upon the earth, and upon all the fishes of the sea; into your hand are they delivered. Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat."

[James Pierce]

Trevor,

In the previous verses, Yahuah told Noah to separate the clean animals from the unclean animals. He was to bring seven clean pair animals, and a pair of unclean animals. Yahuah separate clean from unclean in the beginning here. As far as eating, one could debate the Hebrew meaning "Oklah." That has several meanings. One possible meaning is "fuel." Instead of Yahuah saying that Noah can eat the unclean animals, he uses the animals for fuel, to his desire.

But, lets say that this is not the case, the focus now goes on the word "every." The Greek for "every" is pas. Pas can mean all, each, all of a variety, or a certain sort. Well, we know that in the commandment, Yahuah commands us not to eat unclean animals. One could rightly say that every moving creature only refers to the clean animals Yah separated from the unclean.

It would not make sense for Yah to allow all animals to be eaten, then switch it and say that you could only eat clean animals. Yahuah does not change(Malachi 3).

[Archbishop Trevor 'Elihu' Greene]

Interestingly, Genesis was written in HEBREW. The Hebrew word for every there was "kol or kol". That word means:

all, all for every, all his and every, all his everything, all its the entire, all the and every, all the of every, all the everywhere, all the throughout, all your concerning everything, all your to every, all your throughout (1), all men, all these, all things, altogether......and the list goes on in like manner.

No place in that chapter did it speak of "using the unclean as fuel", and the ONLY type of fuel that a person needs within his body in this reference is food to eat. That wasn't a good attempt, James.